I think this is a great idea! Though I haven't been active on the forums for a while, I remember the madness AJ's English release brought with it (kinda fondly).

However, I have a question. Will people that have been here for a while but have post counts under 50 (me for example OTL) be affected by this new rule?

I know you said "new users", but that's a little ambiguous.

I don't think it'll affect you if you registered before the rule was put through.

I have a question.

Thank you for your time.

Thanks for getting back to me so quickly.

People will contribute one of three things. They could state a know fact. Over time a bunch of facts will collect. Then, people can connect the facts to form conclusions, just like Edgey does with his logic. And, since there isn't enough information to make everything fit together perfectly, people can completely make stuff up, but have some sort of basis for their claims. If someone posts a made-up "fact", others can argue with them.

Basically, it's a modified version of Edgey's logical method of deduction.

Won't you essentially just be making up fancanon together?
Or is it more like getting people to guess the plot twist involving her?

Thank you so much, Croik!!!



Um... It's mostly trying to guess her plot twist, but with a little bit of silliness (wouldn't want to be boring).

Oh, and this is very important: If I warn that there are spoilers in the topic's title, do I still have to use spoiler tags? I'm hoping not, 'cuz otherwise every single post in the entire thread will have a spoiler tag in it....

So, it would be more like a "fancannon", I think. Still not sure what "fancannon" means, though....

y cant i post new freds

I probably won't be wanting to post many threads, but I still think this idea is one of those things that is a good idea in theory but not in practice.

If you don't let people post threads, then they'll hijack other people's threads(it happens without this, so I think it would happen more WITH this). While I think as a whole this isn't worth it, I suggest each forum under this rule at least has a thread for under-50s to post their questions/topics of discussion to discuss, albeit in a more frenzied then normal(but out-of-the-way) fashion. That way they won't really be in the way, can get their answers(maybe) and can make 50 quicker(which is good if they're legit). Perhaps people could adopt their ideas and make them into threads on their behalf.

this is way off topic, but something else. A couple days ago I was banned for asking peoples opinion on the whole ladder or stepladder thing. Now is that really fair?!?!? I mean, and I didn't know about all the other bans for that, and is that fair to THEM?? We weren't being like, obscene and explicit! OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!!!!!!

Next time search whether a topic has already been made or not before you make one. You might have noticed a pattern if you'd done so.

Next person to create this kind of thread gets permabanned.

Any chance of possibly alleviating this rule soon? Given that we're sort of at a standstill for Ace Attorney games at the moment, and that 50 posts is kind of a lot, maybe you could change it to something like 10-20 posts or a few days after registration?

Don't worry about it, getting to 50 posts doesn't take that long.