Page 1 of 1[ 33 posts ]
Google+
Gender: Female
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:11 pm
Posts: 7882
What are your opinions?
I joined yesterday, only because my friend sent a request. I want to see where this is going seeing as it's only early days yet.
Personally I think it looks like a Facebook/Twitter hybrid.
see how it withers before my flower of justice
Re: Google+
Moving on up!
Gender: Female
Location: USA
Rank: Donor
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 5333
Thanks to Blinq for the awesome sig. Click the sig, see my stuff.
Edgeworth/Maya Community. A friends, as lovers, as part of OT3s. All Welcome.
"Yeah, I wouldn't go asking random guys if you can lick their penor." crouton December 2009
Re: Google+
The member who doesn't swear much
Gender: Male
Location: I'm Scotland and I live in Scottish. Wait...
Rank: Prosecutor
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:15 am
Posts: 970
Married to KSAT~. Super Cammy (known as Cammyflage) sprite in avvie by Looby.
I Do LPs. Here's a link to watch them on my channel on YouTube.
I Do LPs. Here's a link to watch them on my channel on YouTube.
Re: Google+
Deputy of Self-Esteem
Gender: Male
Location: Connecticut
Rank: Admin
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:36 pm
Posts: 3449
BSX wrote:
What is a Google+?
Google realized that FaceBook and Twitter were competing with Google for "Website people spend the most time at"; since Google's big product is ads, they want to make Google the one site you spend your time at.
Bump - bump - bump - bump - bump - bump - bump
Re: Google+
Call me Ishmael.
Gender: Male
Location: Sweden
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:16 pm
Posts: 2434
Not sure if I'll join though... At the moment I'm a bit too addicted to Tumblr.
Wife: sparkleranger78, daughter: feedmechocolate247
Re: Google+
Deputy of Self-Esteem
Gender: Male
Location: Connecticut
Rank: Admin
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:36 pm
Posts: 3449
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology ... eepy-line/
Quote:
Eric Schmidt, the CEO of Google, has described his company’s policy: “Google policy is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it.
Bump - bump - bump - bump - bump - bump - bump
Re: Google+
Dog amongst men
Gender: Male
Location: The Netherlands
Rank: Suspect
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 6:29 am
Posts: 13
I don't know why, but those things just don't appeal to me.
Every gun that is made,
every warship launched,
every rocket fired,
signifies, in the final sense,
a theft
from those who hunger and are not fed,
who are cold and are not clothed.
every warship launched,
every rocket fired,
signifies, in the final sense,
a theft
from those who hunger and are not fed,
who are cold and are not clothed.
Re: Google+
Call me Ishmael.
Gender: Male
Location: Sweden
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:16 pm
Posts: 2434
Wooster wrote:
I wouldn't.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology ... eepy-line/
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology ... eepy-line/
Quote:
Eric Schmidt, the CEO of Google, has described his company’s policy: “Google policy is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it.
I don't... quite get what he means by that?
Wife: sparkleranger78, daughter: feedmechocolate247
Re: Google+
Gender: Female
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:11 pm
Posts: 7882
Wooster wrote:
Quote:
Eric Schmidt, the CEO of Google, has described his company’s policy: “Google policy is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it.
Ha! Well as long as they don't... actually cross it. But I have a fair bit of info on Facebook anyway so I'm not exactly safe ¬_¬
see how it withers before my flower of justice
Re: Google+
Deputy of Self-Esteem
Gender: Male
Location: Connecticut
Rank: Admin
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:36 pm
Posts: 3449
Continuing the same link...
Quote:
Schmidt was talking to The Atlantic about the possibility of a Google implant – a chip under your skin that would track you and provide easy web access. That, Schmidt said, was probably over ‘the creepy line’.
However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.
However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.
Bump - bump - bump - bump - bump - bump - bump
Re: Google+
Gender: Female
Location: North America
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:35 pm
Posts: 84
Noa wrote:
I'm not using Twitter or Facebook or anything else, and I won't use Google+.
I don't know why, but those things just don't appeal to me.
I don't know why, but those things just don't appeal to me.
This is the first time I've heard of Google+ and I'm pretty sure I won't be joining. I'm just like you. I don't really like the whole myspace, facebook, twitter thing, but my friends love it.
Re: Google+
Call me Ishmael.
Gender: Male
Location: Sweden
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:16 pm
Posts: 2434
Wooster wrote:
The thing is, it's their definition of crossing the creepy line, not necessarily yours.
Continuing the same link...
Continuing the same link...
Quote:
Schmidt was talking to The Atlantic about the possibility of a Google implant – a chip under your skin that would track you and provide easy web access. That, Schmidt said, was probably over ‘the creepy line’.
However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.
However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.
Oh, I didn't see the link until now. The quote you posted in your previous post was pretty vague when taken out of context.
But, now that I've read it... Yeah, that does sound creepy, almost Orwellian.
Wife: sparkleranger78, daughter: feedmechocolate247
Re: Google+
Gettin' Old!
Gender: Male
Location: Scotland
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:30 pm
Posts: 14363
Though I hope they don't force you to if you have a Youtube account. I remember they once forced you to link your Youtube account to a google account if you wanted to keep using it...they could try that.
Made by Chesu+Zombee
You thought you could be safe in your courts, with your laws and attorneys to protect you. In this world only I am law, my word is fact, my power is absolute.
Re: Google+
Dracarys!
Gender: Male
Location: In a courtroom, for some reason
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 1:00 pm
Posts: 1224
Re: Google+
1000% Knight
Gender: Male
Rank: Moderators
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:06 pm
Posts: 6932
(unless FB/Google+ become the new MySpace/FB >_>)
Credit to Evolina for the sig+avatar!
Re: Google+
猿がまねるようだぜ
Gender: Female
Location: Federal Republic of Germany
Rank: Decisive Witness
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:28 pm
Posts: 177
Pierre wrote:
That's a little twisted....mind you I don't care for Facebook or Twitter so I won't be joining...
Though I hope they don't force you to if you have a Youtube account. I remember they once forced you to link your Youtube account to a google account if you wanted to keep using it...they could try that.
Though I hope they don't force you to if you have a Youtube account. I remember they once forced you to link your Youtube account to a google account if you wanted to keep using it...they could try that.
Because of that I won't join, I already lost my Youtube account... so I have no ambition to support that Google+-thing. Besides, I have a not so active Facebook account and that's even to much...
I really wounder how long it will take google to control really the whole internet
Re: Google+
Gender: Female
Location: United Kingdom
Rank: Medium-in-training
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:33 pm
Posts: 349
Re: Google+
Moving on up!
Gender: Female
Location: USA
Rank: Donor
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 5333
samboo1 wrote:
I've never heard of this. I won't get it. I actually hate these social sites, yet I do have most of them. I feel it is a necessity to have one though. My friends use it to organise events and get in touch. They seem to have forgotten mobile phones exist, because if I'm not on FB chat, then tough luck. The number of events and updates on people that I would miss out on, if I didn't have FB, is scary.
That's why I got into FB as well. I was missing out on so much at my old job because all the people there were on FB and did everything through that. They would forget about us non-FB people.
Thanks to Blinq for the awesome sig. Click the sig, see my stuff.
Edgeworth/Maya Community. A friends, as lovers, as part of OT3s. All Welcome.
"Yeah, I wouldn't go asking random guys if you can lick their penor." crouton December 2009
Re: Google+
Gettin' Old!
Gender: Male
Location: Scotland
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:30 pm
Posts: 14363
Lunaria42 wrote:
samboo1 wrote:
I've never heard of this. I won't get it. I actually hate these social sites, yet I do have most of them. I feel it is a necessity to have one though. My friends use it to organise events and get in touch. They seem to have forgotten mobile phones exist, because if I'm not on FB chat, then tough luck. The number of events and updates on people that I would miss out on, if I didn't have FB, is scary.
That's why I got into FB as well. I was missing out on so much at my old job because all the people there were on FB and did everything through that. They would forget about us non-FB people.
Yeah XP This is the one reason I'm inclined to get facebook, I'm completely out of the loop with my friends most of the time and people talk about events with the details being put on facebook and how they're surprised I didn't have facebook to know about it
Oddly enough I did make a Facebook account once, my uni was doing an easter egg hunt and to get clues you had to join them, so I made a fake email for it.
What can I say I love my creme eggs.
Made by Chesu+Zombee
You thought you could be safe in your courts, with your laws and attorneys to protect you. In this world only I am law, my word is fact, my power is absolute.
Re: Google+
Gender: Female
Location: United Kingdom
Rank: Medium-in-training
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:33 pm
Posts: 349
Pierre wrote:
Lunaria42 wrote:
samboo1 wrote:
I've never heard of this. I won't get it. I actually hate these social sites, yet I do have most of them. I feel it is a necessity to have one though. My friends use it to organise events and get in touch. They seem to have forgotten mobile phones exist, because if I'm not on FB chat, then tough luck. The number of events and updates on people that I would miss out on, if I didn't have FB, is scary.
That's why I got into FB as well. I was missing out on so much at my old job because all the people there were on FB and did everything through that. They would forget about us non-FB people.
Yeah XP This is the one reason I'm inclined to get facebook, I'm completely out of the loop with my friends most of the time and people talk about events with the details being put on facebook and how they're surprised I didn't have facebook to know about it
Oddly enough I did make a Facebook account once, my uni was doing an easter egg hunt and to get clues you had to join them, so I made a fake email for it.
What can I say I love my creme eggs.
Creme eggs
So worth getting FB for.
Re: Google+
Gender: Female
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:11 pm
Posts: 7882
Wooster wrote:
The thing is, it's their definition of crossing the creepy line, not necessarily yours.
Continuing the same link...
Continuing the same link...
Quote:
Schmidt was talking to The Atlantic about the possibility of a Google implant – a chip under your skin that would track you and provide easy web access. That, Schmidt said, was probably over ‘the creepy line’.
However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.
However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.
Ok yeah that is creepy.
Lunaria42 wrote:
That's why I got into FB as well. I was missing out on so much at my old job because all the people there were on FB and did everything through that. They would forget about us non-FB people.
I'd hate to have all my work colleagues on there DX but Facebook is the main way I keep up to date with family news.. that's pretty crap hahaha
samboo1 wrote:
Pierre wrote:
What can I say I love my creme eggs.
Creme eggs
So worth getting FB for.Agreed
So yeah, I think I'll end up forgetting about Google+ in a few days ¬_¬ It's still early days and no-one is on it.
see how it withers before my flower of justice
Re: Google+
The member who doesn't swear much
Gender: Male
Location: I'm Scotland and I live in Scottish. Wait...
Rank: Prosecutor
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:15 am
Posts: 970
But nah, not interested in Google+ because no-one else I know has one.
Married to KSAT~. Super Cammy (known as Cammyflage) sprite in avvie by Looby.
I Do LPs. Here's a link to watch them on my channel on YouTube.
I Do LPs. Here's a link to watch them on my channel on YouTube.
Re: Google+
Gender: Female
Location: United Kingdom
Rank: Medium-in-training
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:33 pm
Posts: 349
Re: Google+
Story writer and music lover.
Gender: Male
Location: Maryland
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:02 am
Posts: 2353
Wooster wrote:
The thing is, it's their definition of crossing the creepy line, not necessarily yours.
Continuing the same link...
Continuing the same link...
Quote:
Schmidt was talking to The Atlantic about the possibility of a Google implant – a chip under your skin that would track you and provide easy web access. That, Schmidt said, was probably over ‘the creepy line’.
However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.
However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.
Yeah, I'm not too into the whole thing of having computer chips implanted under my skin. Too much like all those sci-fi movies and whatnot.
Right now, however, I'm not aboard the Google+ train; still a Twitter/Facebook guy. (Though I hardly use either of those, really.)
--Millini (Official CR Rock Prince and Gavinism convert.)
Re: Google+
My childhood right here
Gender: Male
Location: The motherfuggin' DigiWorld!
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:55 am
Posts: 1788
Wooster wrote:
The thing is, it's their definition of crossing the creepy line, not necessarily yours.
Continuing the same link...
Continuing the same link...
Quote:
Schmidt was talking to The Atlantic about the possibility of a Google implant – a chip under your skin that would track you and provide easy web access. That, Schmidt said, was probably over ‘the creepy line’.
However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.
However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.
Oh dear God. I hope Google doesn't read my mind. Searching would suck. Words would never be formed. At least, semi-SFW words...
Re: Google+
Beautiful flower
Gender: None specified
Rank: Decisive Witness
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:45 am
Posts: 193
I'm quite skeptical since it's Goo-I'll-get-as-much-info-from-you-gle, but for now I'll wait and see how it turns out. I don't think I'll have any use of it though.
I'm not the type to share my personal info on the net and I don't have FB (no offense to those who did), so I didn't find it interesting. Besides that, CR and Skype already got me preoccupied, I don't think I'll be able to handle more. Just like my MySpace account.
Re: Google+
Here for my yearly login
Gender: Male
Rank: Decisive Witness
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:43 am
Posts: 231
Signatures are hard...
Re: Google+
:)
Gender: Female
Location: UK
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:33 pm
Posts: 3478
Re: Google+
Gender: Female
Location: United Kingdom
Rank: Medium-in-training
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:33 pm
Posts: 349
Re: Google+
Gender: Female
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:11 pm
Posts: 7882
I agree about the circles thing though, seems stupid and yes it does look like a cheap version of Facebook.
I wonder what other stuff they'll add to it soon..
see how it withers before my flower of justice
Re: Google+
They don't :c
Gender: Male
Location: http://www.ezilon.com/maps/images/southamerica/political-map-of-Argentina.gif
Rank: Moderators
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:34 pm
Posts: 3188
Wooster wrote:
The thing is, it's their definition of crossing the creepy line, not necessarily yours.
Continuing the same link...
Continuing the same link...
Quote:
Schmidt was talking to The Atlantic about the possibility of a Google implant – a chip under your skin that would track you and provide easy web access. That, Schmidt said, was probably over ‘the creepy line’.
However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.
However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.
I am okay with this.
Re: Google+
ケーキたん（仮）
Gender: None specified
Location: Fukuoka, Japan
Rank: Scanlator
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 7:40 am
Posts: 1383
It reminds me of everything I used to like about Facebook before they kept screwing up the layout: simple, clean, easy to use. I don't care about games, polls and all that other garbage, so I'm glad there's nothing like that in G+(..for now anyway). I just get my info, post what I want, and that's it. Nothing inbetween.
And Circles are pretty much the best thing. I like that I can categorize my friends so that I don't have to share EVERY status post, pictures and so on to EVERYbody. Any "drama" caused by that will simply be because people get butthurt too easily. It's a really nice form of keeping my privacy while still being able to talk about and show whatever to people that are relevant to the topic.
Re: Google+
Apollon Flame
Gender: Male
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 10:14 pm
Posts: 1638
A King
in name
alone...
Page 1 of 1
[ 33 posts ]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot [Bot?] and 10 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
News
Site map
SitemapIndex
RSS Feed