LoginCourt-Records.netBetaDiscordRegister

 Board index » Phoenix Wright » Defendant's Lobby » Hazakurain (GS3)

Page 1 of 1[ 13 posts ]
 


The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineProsecutor Wed Jul 30, 2008 2:59 am
User avatar
Ayasato-chan

Magical isn't it?

Gender: Female

Location: In ur sig

Rank: Prosecutor

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:08 am

Posts: 892

Okay, I can pretty much play straight through all the games without a single mistake. With the sole exception of Case 3-4 (Turnabout Beginnings). I always have a problem with some of Gumshoe's testimony and I draw a complete blank on one of Dahlia's (I think it was when we were establishing a motive). I replayed it about 3 hrs. ago. I made 4 mistakes. 3 were on Dahlia, and the other one was an accident when I hit the wrong button.
Retired from the RP Section

Image
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Re: The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineDesk Jockey Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:39 pm
Bloodroot Godot

none

Gender: None specified

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:23 pm

Posts: 111

Huh. I thought 3-2 was more confusing. I didn't have much trouble with 3-4. I think I was too caught up with Diego to be confused by anything. :edgy:
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Re: The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineMedium-in-training Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:55 pm
User avatar
WallofIllusion

ヘラヘラ～

Gender: Female

Rank: Medium-in-training

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:27 pm

Posts: 319

Well, this seems to be an appropriate place to share my thought on a particular testimony from this case.

Spoiler: 3-4
I believe it's Dahlia's second testimony after the recess. The one where she talks about the kidnapping. You're supposed to present the map of the bridge to the statement that Terry pushed her from behind. Mia says that that's a contradiction because she would wind up being pushed towards the broken part of the bridge and wind up dead on the rocks (oh bummer, right?).
I cannot for the life of me make this make sense in my head.
Dahlia and Terry were standing facing Valerie on the bridge. If Terry pushed Dahlia in the back, she would be pushed forward. Towards Valerie. In the flashback images, Terry and Dahlia are shown as being closer to the broken side of the bridge, so if she's pushed from behind, she'd be pushed... away from the broken part of the bridge.

Where is this supposed contradiction??

Now that I've ranted, I'm sure someone is going to point out something very obvious that I've missed. Go right ahead. I'm tired of being bewildered.
Image
"A truthful witness does not deceive, but a false witness pours out lies." Proverbs 14:5. Straight from the Bible, folks~ XD
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Re: The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineDesk Jockey Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:34 pm
User avatar
vio55

Gender: Female

Location: USA

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:16 pm

Posts: 100

WallofIllusion wrote:
Well, this seems to be an appropriate place to share my thought on a particular testimony from this case.

Spoiler: 3-4
I believe it's Dahlia's second testimony after the recess. The one where she talks about the kidnapping. You're supposed to present the map of the bridge to the statement that Terry pushed her from behind. Mia says that that's a contradiction because she would wind up being pushed towards the broken part of the bridge and wind up dead on the rocks (oh bummer, right?).
I cannot for the life of me make this make sense in my head.
Dahlia and Terry were standing facing Valerie on the bridge. If Terry pushed Dahlia in the back, she would be pushed forward. Towards Valerie. In the flashback images, Terry and Dahlia are shown as being closer to the broken side of the bridge, so if she's pushed from behind, she'd be pushed... away from the broken part of the bridge.

Where is this supposed contradiction??

Now that I've ranted, I'm sure someone is going to point out something very obvious that I've missed. Go right ahead. I'm tired of being bewildered.


Hmm...

That testimony sounds very familiar, and I don't think it had anything to do with the kidnapping part.

I think it was when it was just Valerie and Terry on the bridge, before she was killed. Valerie was by the broken part of the bridge, and if she was pushed she'd land on the rocks.

I've only played 3-4 once and it was a while ago, so I may be wrong. o__o
Image
-x- theme by sugarpoultry -x-
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Re: The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineMedium-in-training Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:40 pm
User avatar
WallofIllusion

ヘラヘラ～

Gender: Female

Rank: Medium-in-training

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:27 pm

Posts: 319

vio55 wrote:
WallofIllusion wrote:
Well, this seems to be an appropriate place to share my thought on a particular testimony from this case.

Spoiler: 3-4
I believe it's Dahlia's second testimony after the recess. The one where she talks about the kidnapping. You're supposed to present the map of the bridge to the statement that Terry pushed her from behind. Mia says that that's a contradiction because she would wind up being pushed towards the broken part of the bridge and wind up dead on the rocks (oh bummer, right?).
I cannot for the life of me make this make sense in my head.
Dahlia and Terry were standing facing Valerie on the bridge. If Terry pushed Dahlia in the back, she would be pushed forward. Towards Valerie. In the flashback images, Terry and Dahlia are shown as being closer to the broken side of the bridge, so if she's pushed from behind, she'd be pushed... away from the broken part of the bridge.

Where is this supposed contradiction??

Now that I've ranted, I'm sure someone is going to point out something very obvious that I've missed. Go right ahead. I'm tired of being bewildered.


Hmm...

That testimony sounds very familiar, and I don't think it had anything to do with the kidnapping part.

I think it was when it was just Valerie and Terry on the bridge, before she was killed. Valerie was by the broken part of the bridge, and if she was pushed she'd land on the rocks.

I've only played 3-4 once and it was a while ago, so I may be wrong. o__o


Nope, it's definitely the kidnapping.
Spoiler: 3-4
Because then it proves that Dahlia jumped, rather than being pushed, so the kidnapping was faked.
Image
"A truthful witness does not deceive, but a false witness pours out lies." Proverbs 14:5. Straight from the Bible, folks~ XD
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Re: The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineDesk Jockey Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:48 pm
User avatar
Underqwertyuiop

Gender: Male

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:18 am

Posts: 72

WallofIllusion wrote:
Well, this seems to be an appropriate place to share my thought on a particular testimony from this case.

Spoiler: 3-4
I believe it's Dahlia's second testimony after the recess. The one where she talks about the kidnapping. You're supposed to present the map of the bridge to the statement that Terry pushed her from behind. Mia says that that's a contradiction because she would wind up being pushed towards the broken part of the bridge and wind up dead on the rocks (oh bummer, right?).
I cannot for the life of me make this make sense in my head.
Dahlia and Terry were standing facing Valerie on the bridge. If Terry pushed Dahlia in the back, she would be pushed forward. Towards Valerie. In the flashback images, Terry and Dahlia are shown as being closer to the broken side of the bridge, so if she's pushed from behind, she'd be pushed... away from the broken part of the bridge.

Where is this supposed contradiction??

Now that I've ranted, I'm sure someone is going to point out something very obvious that I've missed. Go right ahead. I'm tired of being bewildered.


I don't think they ever said that she was pushed from behind, just pushed off the bridge.
Image
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Re: The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineDesk Jockey Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:39 pm
User avatar
slaix223

Gender: Male

Location: At my computer.

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 9:14 pm

Posts: 61

WallofIllusion wrote:
Well, this seems to be an appropriate place to share my thought on a particular testimony from this case.

Spoiler: 3-4
I believe it's Dahlia's second testimony after the recess. The one where she talks about the kidnapping. You're supposed to present the map of the bridge to the statement that Terry pushed her from behind. Mia says that that's a contradiction because she would wind up being pushed towards the broken part of the bridge and wind up dead on the rocks (oh bummer, right?).
I cannot for the life of me make this make sense in my head.
Dahlia and Terry were standing facing Valerie on the bridge. If Terry pushed Dahlia in the back, she would be pushed forward. Towards Valerie. In the flashback images, Terry and Dahlia are shown as being closer to the broken side of the bridge, so if she's pushed from behind, she'd be pushed... away from the broken part of the bridge.

Where is this supposed contradiction??

Now that I've ranted, I'm sure someone is going to point out something very obvious that I've missed. Go right ahead. I'm tired of being bewildered.


Spoiler:
I don't think they said that he pushed her in the back, just pushed her back, which would make her fall through the hole in the bridge. At least, that's how I remember it. I could be wrong though.
*Has nothing to place in sig*
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Re: The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineProsecutor Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:50 am
User avatar
Ayasato-chan

Magical isn't it?

Gender: Female

Location: In ur sig

Rank: Prosecutor

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:08 am

Posts: 892

Guys, you don't need spoiler tags for this topic.

And Dahlia (who lied anyway) said she was shoved from behind. Edgeworth could easily have said the defendant (Mr. Fawles) turned around to push her off. Valerie still would've shot Terry in the arm and nothing would change. Therefore this contradiction is very minor and explanable.
Retired from the RP Section

Image
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Re: The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineMedium-in-training Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:48 am
User avatar
WallofIllusion

ヘラヘラ～

Gender: Female

Rank: Medium-in-training

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:27 pm

Posts: 319

Technically it doesn't have a spoiler warning in the title, so... *shrug* I was just being safe.

...So, anyway, upon reading part of the script, I have come to feel INCREDIBLY. STUPID.
When pressed on that statement, Dahlia says that she turned to run and Terry turned to chase her. Soo what she says does create a contradiction. I am so sorry. -goes into a corner and dies of shame-
Image
"A truthful witness does not deceive, but a false witness pours out lies." Proverbs 14:5. Straight from the Bible, folks~ XD
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Re: The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineDesk Jockey Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:39 pm
Bloodroot Godot

none

Gender: None specified

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:23 pm

Posts: 111

*skims through topic*
*eats a Sweetart*
Now that I think on it, it didn't confuse me because I was thinking up ways to strangle young Edgeworth.
And hoping he wasn't a main character who would show up again.
...
T&T was my first PW game.
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Re: The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineAce Attorney Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:05 pm
User avatar
Acey Enn

The Robert Downey Jr. Of Cookies

Gender: Female

Location: Charismaville

Rank: Ace Attorney

Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:08 am

Posts: 1149

I found the whole game confusing, but that's because I'm an idiot who can't figure anything out, ever.

Also, Terry is totally a time-traveling caveman.
Image
WARNING: My dA may contain swearing, bad fanart, and gratuitous lesbianism.
BTW, GIVE GUMSHOE SOME GODDAMN MONEY, BITCHES
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Re: The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineDesk Jockey Sat Aug 02, 2008 2:20 am
Bloodroot Godot

none

Gender: None specified

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:23 pm

Posts: 111

I screamed when he first chewed on the ball. And when I first saw Armstrong, but that's a given.
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Re: The OFFICIAL 3-4 Confuses the hell out of me threadTopic%20Title
OfflineDesk Jockey Sat Aug 02, 2008 2:27 am
User avatar
Magnus Orion

Gender: Male

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:15 am

Posts: 144

3-4 always seemed pretty straight forward to me... Could you include possible examples of difficult parts? :think:
ImageImageImage
magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6 magatamabreaker6
Page 1 of 1 [ 13 posts ] 
 
Print view | Previous topic | Next topic 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

 Board index » Phoenix Wright » Defendant's Lobby » Hazakurain (GS3)

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  
cron
News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list
Powered by phpBB

phpBB SEO