Chaos wolf
Gender: Male
Location: London, England
Rank: Moderators
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 631
Just finished case 4, before tackling the doozie ridden tense filled fun that will be the last case. It occured to me though... why in case 1, given it's obviously set a year later, why Mia didn't really seem to recognise Dahlia OR the pendant in question, especially when it contained poison (as said by Terry). Was this done for dramatic license? Are we expected to believe Mia would forget the witness and especially the poison circumstances?
I understand why they were done in this order... to build up the suspense and for us to figure out how Diego was murdered and why, but logically it doesn't hold a lot of water for me. Unless I suspend belief a little ;)
Btw when was Diego poisoned by Dahlia... I recall the game saying 8 (?) months before Phoenix's case, which would make it what, 4 months after the Terry case? What was he wanting to talk to her about..? Is this revealed in case 5? A simple yes/no needed here, I'll find out for myself eventually ;)
Lie with passion and be forever damned...
360 gamertag: Mayhem64