So as a promotion for GS5, Capcom has made a mystery quiz. You can only access it from a cell phone, and you need to make a (free) account. However, with my mad haxor skillz (aka google) I have broken into the site, and shall present the mystery quiz for you all to enjoy!
Quote:
~The Bloody Character in the Locked Room~
Today was once again a fierce courtroom battle for Phoenix Wright. But when he got back to his office, it was none other than Detective Gumshoe waiting for him.
Gumshoe: Hey! Today you're going to pay your dues, pal! Phoenix: Detective Gumshoe, what's wrong? If you've run out of ramen, I'm not going to treat you... Gumshoe: I have plenty of ramen, pal! Just look at this.
Phoenix: ...Is this a ナ? (ナ is a Japanese character pronounced "na") Gumshoe: It's a ナ, pal. This is the important dying message that the victim left in a locked room murder mystery that took place in a nearby mansion.
Here is a summary of the incident, according to Detective Gumshoe:
The victim is 27-year old Natsumi Sakuraba (桜庭奈津美) who lived in the mansion.
She was a teacher. She taught Japanese at a nearby middle school.
She was stabbed in the back with a knife in the center of one of the rooms of her house.
There were no windows in the room. The only entrance or exit was a door, which was locked from the inside with a key.
Natsumi's relatives thought it was strange that they didn't hear from her, so they alerted the police. The police broke down the door to the room, and found that nobody else was inside.
Gumshoe: The only person whose name begins with "na" around here... is you, pal! You're the one who did it, aren't ya, pal?! (Nick's Japanese name is Naruhodou Ryuuichi) Phoenix: H-Hold on a second. I didn't have any connection to the victim. Gumshoe: B-But, out of all the people the victim knew and that lived near her, you're the only one with a name that begins with "na"... Phoenix: (And you're trying to arrest me based on that alone?!) By the way, when exactly did the victim die? Gumshoe: According to forensics, it was about 6PM yesterday, pal. Phoenix: I was in the middle of a trial at that time! Gumshoe: Eh? B-But then what does this dying "na" message mean, pal?! Phoenix: I don't know. Maybe she ran out of strength before finishing writing it? You said that she was found in a locked room... Maybe the victim was stabbed by the criminal, escaped to that room, and then locked it from the inside? Isn't it possible that she finally died after all that?
Gumshoe: Urp... I never thought of that, pal... Phoenix: (As fit a detective as always...)
As if he hadn't thought of that case until now, Detective Gumshoe fell silent.
After an in-depth investigation it was discovered that, just as Phoenix predicted, the room was locked by the victim herself. Furthermore, it was understood that the motive was a grudge, and the suspects are the 4 people below that hated the victim:
Sujio Ooshima (大島筋雄): Gym teacher. He held one-sided love for the victim, but was hated by her in return.
Atsutoshi Tomota (友田厚敏): Math teacher. The victim would point out his mistakes on a daily basis, and so he grew to hate her.
Shizuko Sayama (左山静子): Music teacher. In the past, the victim stole her boyfriend.
Hirosuke Arikawa (有川博資): Physics teacher. He owed the victim a large amount of money.
There is no doubt that the killer is one of these four.
Phoenix thought about the dying message, and... "Ah, I got it."
Who is the killer? And what did the dying message refer to? (The victim's name, the killer's name, her lover's contact address, or the truth of the loan.)
(If you're at a loss... this might be a helpful tool.)
Spoiler: Another hint
Every character in the Japanese writing system has a set stroke order that you're supposed to write the symbol in
Now then... Select your answer!
Spoiler: Sujio Ooshiima, victim's name
Nope
Spoiler: Sujio Ooshiima, killer's name
Nope
Spoiler: Sujio Ooshiima, lover's address
Nope
Spoiler: Sujio Ooshiima, loan's truth
Nope
Spoiler: Atsutoshi Tomota, victim's name
Nope
Spoiler: Atsutoshi Tomota, killer's name
Nope
Spoiler: Atsutoshi Tomota, lover's address
Nope
Spoiler: Atsutoshi Tomota, loan's truth
Nope
Spoiler: Shizuko Sayama, victim's name
Nope
Spoiler: Shizuko Sayama, killer's name
Nope
Spoiler: Shizuko Sayama, lover's address
Nope
Spoiler: Shizuko Sayama, loan's truth
Nope
Spoiler: Hirosuke Arikawa, victim's name
Nope
Spoiler: Hirosuke Arikawa, killer's name
You got it!~
The clue is that, as you can see from the blood, the victim wrote the vertical line before the horizontal line. For the first 3 suspects, for the first kanji in their name, you write the horizontal line before the vertical line. However, for the first kanji in Hirosuke's name, you write the vertical line first; moreover, because the victim was a Japanese teacher, we can be sure that she would know the proper stroke order and would write the kanji in that order.
Here is another, old mystery quiz (unrelated to GS5), translated by Ash:
Quote:
Episode 8 ~A Battle of Offense and Defense at the Witness Stand~
Right now, I am standing in the witness stand. To ensure that that man I hate so much is found guilty of murder.
"The witness claims to have seen the murderer in the victim's room on the day of the crime?" I answer yes to the judge's question and continue.
"It was snowing that day, and the night was very cold. I just happened to look at the apartment room across my room and saw the victim preparing a hot pot dish, when suddenly a man entered her room. I had seen him in the victim's room before, because I occasionally look out of my room like this. So I knew he was her boyfriend, the defendant who is standing here in front of my eyes!"
"Hold it!" The defendant's attorney said in a fluster. "There is a road about 20 meters wide between your apartment and the victim's one. How could you have seen the victim's room?" He's just nitpicking. I answer. "She had not drawn the curtains in her room. At night, if you don't draw the curtains and switch on the lights inside, you can see everything from outside. And by the way, the eyesight of both my eyes is 1.5." Kkkkkk. I could hear the lawyer's teeth grinding. "Continue your testimony," the judge said.
"I had nothing better to do, so I just watched them. At first, they were getting along fine, picking food from the hot pot, but then they started to argue. The argument became fiercer and then the man got a knife from the kitchen, stabbed the victim and fled." "Hold it!" The persistent lawyer spoke again. "So it was a crime on the spur of the moment. But there were no fingerprints found on the murder weapon." "He had wiped away the fingerprints. I just forgot to tell you. The murderer wiped away the fingerprints and then fled." "And you were just looking. You didn't call for the police." "It just took a couple of seconds to wipe away the fingerprints. I called the police immediately after he fled of course." "No, he didn't flee right away. When the body was discovered, the kerosene heater in the victim's room was on. Didn't the murderer try warm up the body to mess up the estimated time of the murder?" I was surprised at this sharp question of the laywer, but answered. "I already said it was cold that day. The heater was on from the beginning"
Then the lawyer yelled elated: "Objection! There is a contradiction in your testimony!"
What's your deduction? The police saw through the man's lie, but based on what?
Pick your answer:
Spoiler: The reflection of the window -> The room was not visible from outside
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The reflection of the window -> There was no reason for wiping away the fingerprints
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The reflection of the window -> The time of the reporting was weird
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The reflection of the window -> There was no reason for faking the time of the murder
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The light in the room -> The room was not visible from outside
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The light in the room -> There was no reason for wiping away the fingerprints
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The light in the room -> The time of the reporting was weird
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The light in the room -> There was no reason for faking the time of the murder
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The fingerprints on the knife -> The room was not visible from outside
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The fingerprints on the knife -> There was no reason for wiping away the fingerprints
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The fingerprints on the knife -> The time of the reporting was weird
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The fingerprints on the knife -> There was no reason for faking the time of the murder
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The kerosene heater -> The room was not visible from outside
Correct.
The contradiction in the testimony is...
The window was fogged up.
The witness said she saw the faces of the people in the room from 20 meters across. But if the stove was on and the victim was making a hot pot then the window had to be fogged up because of the difference in temperatures inside and outside.
No matter how good your eyesight, you can't identify the face of someone through a fogged up window 20 meters away.
The witness was actually stalking the victim. His warped sense of love in the end drove him to murder and he tried to blame the victim's boyfriend for it.
Spoiler: The kerosene heater -> There was no reason for wiping away the fingerprints
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The kerosene heater -> The time of the reporting was weird
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The kerosene heater -> There was no reason for faking the time of the murder
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Thanks for translating this! I'm sure its not canon, but I wonder if having Gumshoe in the quiz means he's in the game. He could just be the go to detective character for stuff like this, though.
I used to have Sam Waterston as my avatar but photobucket added a watermark and also Law & Order has been cancelled for 10 years so it's time for me to move on.
There are a couple of more on the mobile website and while a lot of them focus on Japanese scripts, some of them would lend themselves better for localisation (but actually, all the other quizzes besides the one here don't actually feature AA characters, instead featuring nameless protagonists and such).
"One dumbbell, Watson! Consider an athlete with one dumbbell! Picture to yourself the unilateral development, the imminent danger of a spinal curvature. Shocking, Watson, shocking!" - The Valley of Fear
It's days like this I'm glad I know Japanese. I figured something was off immediately since it's clear that the horizontal line was written after the vertical one. At first, I thought that might have implied that the killer took her hand and made the horizontal line to cover up her writing of ノ ("no").
There are a couple of more on the mobile website and while a lot of them focus on Japanese scripts, some of them would lend themselves better for localisation (but actually, all the other quizzes besides the one here don't actually feature AA characters, instead featuring nameless protagonists and such).
On the Gyakuten Tsuushin mobile website (14 older quizes are available in the quiz archives). But again, in theory you have to be a member of the site to be able to access those.
If people are really interested, I might translate some too, though I have to say again that they are just mystery quizes with no real relation to the series (the older ones don't even feature the AA characters).
"One dumbbell, Watson! Consider an athlete with one dumbbell! Picture to yourself the unilateral development, the imminent danger of a spinal curvature. Shocking, Watson, shocking!" - The Valley of Fear
A quick translation of a story that doesn't need knowledge of Japanese. (The font-color of the lines spoken by the lawyer is blue by the way, sorta suggesting that this is Phoenix. But not really)
Quote:
Episode 8 ~A Battle of Offense and Defense at the Witness Stand~
Right now, I am standing in the witness stand. To ensure that that man I hate so much is found guilty of murder.
"The witness claims to have seen the murderer in the victim's room on the day of the crime?" I answer yes to the judge's question and continue.
"It was snowing that day, and the night was very cold. I just happened to look at the apartment room across my room and saw the victim preparing a hot pot dish, when suddenly a man entered her room. I had seen him in the victim's room before, because I occasionally look out of my room like this. So I knew he was her boyfriend, the defendant who is standing here in front of my eyes!"
"Hold it!" The defendant's attorney said in a fluster. "There is a road about 20 meters wide between your apartment and the victim's one. How could you have seen the victim's room?" He's just nitpicking. I answer. "She had not drawn the curtains in her room. At night, if you don't draw the curtains and switch on the lights inside, you can see everything from outside. And by the way, the eyesight of both my eyes is 1.5." Kkkkkk. I could hear the lawyer's teeth grinding. "Continue your testimony," the judge said.
"I had nothing better to do, so I just watched them. At first, they were getting along fine, picking food from the hot pot, but then they started to argue. The argument became fiercer and then the man got a knife from the kitchen, stabbed the victim and fled." "Hold it!" The persistent lawyer spoke again. "So it was a crime on the spur of the moment. But there were no fingerprints found on the murder weapon." "He had wiped away the fingerprints. I just forgot to tell you. The murderer wiped away the fingerprints and then fled." "And you were just looking. You didn't call for the police." "It just took a couple of seconds to wipe away the fingerprints. I called the police immediately after he fled of course." "No, he didn't flee right away. When the body was discovered, the kerosene heater in the victim's room was on. Didn't the murderer try warm up the body to mess up the estimated time of the murder?" I was surprised at this sharp question of the laywer, but answered. "I already said it was cold that day. The heater was on from the beginning"
Then the lawyer yelled elated: "Objection! There is a contradiction in your testimony!"
What's your deduction? The police saw through the man's lie, but based on what?
Pick your answer:
Spoiler: The reflection of the window -> The room was not visible from outside
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The reflection of the window -> There was no reason for wiping away the fingerprints
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The reflection of the window -> The time of the reporting was weird
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The reflection of the window -> There was no reason for faking the time of the murder
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The light in the room -> The room was not visible from outside
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The light in the room -> There was no reason for wiping away the fingerprints
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The light in the room -> The time of the reporting was weird
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The light in the room -> There was no reason for faking the time of the murder
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The fingerprints on the knife -> The room was not visible from outside
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The fingerprints on the knife -> There was no reason for wiping away the fingerprints
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The fingerprints on the knife -> The time of the reporting was weird
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The fingerprints on the knife -> There was no reason for faking the time of the murder
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The kerosene heater -> The room was not visible from outside
Correct.
The contradiction in the testimony is...
The window was fogged up.
The witness said she saw the faces of the people in the room from 20 meters across. But if the stove was on and the victim was making a hot pot then the window had to be fogged up because of the difference in temperatures inside and outside.
No matter how good your eyesight, you can't identify the face of someone through a fogged up window 20 meters away.
The witness was actually stalking the victim. His warped sense of love in the end drove him to murder and he tried to blame the victim's boyfriend for it.
Spoiler: The kerosene heater -> There was no reason for wiping away the fingerprints
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The kerosene heater -> The time of the reporting was weird
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
Spoiler: The kerosene heater -> There was no reason for faking the time of the murder
Bad!
Too bad, but your answer is wrong. Try to deduce again.
Hint: Try to visualise the circumstances at the murder scene based on the witness' testimony.
"One dumbbell, Watson! Consider an athlete with one dumbbell! Picture to yourself the unilateral development, the imminent danger of a spinal curvature. Shocking, Watson, shocking!" - The Valley of Fear
Last edited by Ash on Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Yikes. This wouldn't lend itself to localisation very nicely...:p
Dont underestimate the team that quickly, they take special care with localization that they brilliantly find an alternative.
For example, we can have an obscurely written M, which can later turn out that the victim was upside down when writing a W or on the side when writing an E, writing in Blood while in pain never lets you write perfectly after all.
A quick translation of a story that doesn't need knowledge of Japanese. (The font-color of the lines spoken by the lawyer is blue by the way, sorta suggesting that this is Phoenix. But not really)
[/quote]
That was a nice one too, but your link doesnt work.
I thought it was "The kerosene heater -> There was no reason to fake the time of the murder", because he could have laid the body on the stove or something. But as they say, the music kept playing.
Japan clearly haven't heard of triple glass windows. Those don't fog even if it is hot inside and freezer cold outside. Fogging is caused by heat leaks, and triple glass windows are designed to reduce that.
^I copied the URL from my cellphone, so it might be some kind of magic URL that only works for (Japanese) cellphones ^_~'
"One dumbbell, Watson! Consider an athlete with one dumbbell! Picture to yourself the unilateral development, the imminent danger of a spinal curvature. Shocking, Watson, shocking!" - The Valley of Fear
I was gonna say "Would've been easier to figure out if the Kana had been present" but then I noticed the Kana just weren't visible on the page, they are here in the forum... personally, I first thought it was gonna be an attempt at drawing a Ya. And then they suddenly make this a Yatagarasu case.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum