Gender: Female
Location: Australia
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 2197
Quote:
Phoenix isn't in there, only some rookie lawyer defending him...my theory holds some water
Phoenix kept appearing in the Defendant Lobby (he's the defendant!) You can imagine anything you like to fill the holes, but if there's no basis to support it shown in the actual games as implying evidence, then there is nothing to argue it as valid. I could just as easily make an outrageous claim that Phoenix lives on Mars and is a shapeshifter, returning to Mars when he's not on-screen, and it would be just as valid, since there's nothing to either hint for or against either of our theories.
Assumptions you make have to have some sort of supporting hint or precedent in the games, and the only evidence that we got hints that the previous 3 games (sans 1-5) and relations to characters from it ceased to exist, somehow erased from reality at the start of the Flashback Trial. Because the character's absence and the lack of mention of them, violates every precedent we had of their behaviour in the first 3 games.
Quote:
And People are extremely unlikely to assume Maya would be there at all, we all knew in advance the hero of this game would be Apollo Justice and we expected a brand new cast Maya should be the last thing on people's minds except you foolishly...I'm willing to bet that Maya was not even considered
Practically
everyone wonders where Maya is. Look right now - two REPEAT topics on the GS4 board posted by people decrying the issue - and it's ages since release. The only people who don't wonder where she is are people who actively hated her. You didn't like her, but a lot of fans did.
Of course 'Maya was never even considered'. I have repeated ad infinitum the game is written as a reality where she and Edgeworth simply don't exist, save a few token Easter Eggs (much like an Easter Egg cameo from a char of a different games series by the same company.) This would have been okay IF they had not returned Phoenix in any capacity. But returning him in such a way as they did, literally, in writing, in that the sum total of the actions, events and relationships of the previous 3 games have ceased to exist is unreasonable.
Let's pretend, I don't know, you were fired from your job. Can we expect that suddenly, even that
very same day, your connections with every friend and family member (even ones you would die for, or even put yourself through law school for) would suddenly disappear? Or that everything you had done for the last 3 years, no matter how significant, would cease to have any real bearing or significance on your future?
Come
on!
Anything would have worked! Even just one line like:
Trucy: Daddy, you're off(screen) so often, I missed you.
Phoenix: Don't worry Trucy, I've been working with some FRIENDS on my 'secret mission'.
See? From that one line, we could have extrapolated to ourselves that maybe he saw old chars when he's off-screen. There's evidence! They don't have to be specifically 'mentioned' to 'confuse' new players. But we don't even get this! All the
evidence just points to him being alone, a character with no meaningful connections even to undefined characters.
The biggest failure is this: even if the old chars were not being returned to the games, there should have been proper implying to indicate that when we don't see Phoenix he has meaningful levels of interaction with
Unarticulated in this arc Friend Character X.
Instead, we just get repeated
contrary evidence that Phoenix is totally alone, save Trucy. Being 'disbarred' is NOT an adequate explanation for this as it violates every precedent we saw in games 1-3.
Quote:
Nick is a very changed person from when we knew him in T+T, maybe Maya didn't like the changes and decided it wasn't worth sticking around with a bum who drinks grape juice all the time and focus on her own career.
Sure that's a
possibility - but what's the point of destroying such a close friendship from the original trilogy for no reason whatsoever, a completely pointless retrospect? Did it create an epic plot or any plot at all? Did it make money? Did it please fans? Did it help Apollo? Did it contribute to cases? Did it achieve anything useful at all? And since this is
not actually explained or hinted to either (it's Maya
doesn't exist, not Maya has left, since she 'didn't exist' in flashback either and she would not have got fed up and left then) we fall back on 3-5 as precedent, to which her absence is contradictory.
Quote:
Eldoon is a friend for one thing and I got the impression Shadi and him shared a kind of friendship even if he tried to cheat.
Didn't 'Shadi' only even turn up again that
one time after 7 years? That's not friendship. And 'Shadi' wanted to ruin Phoenix. That's a strange idea of 'friendship'.
Quote:
In addition I'm conducting a survey to see what 'new players' think of Phoenix so we'll see but...
How many of the 'new players' here would not be at least aware of the other games though? Especially in a forum like this one. However, at least it's an interesting topic... might be more productive at a more general games forum.
Quote:
Phoenix [to Kristoph]: ...Because I remembered your kindness back when everyone had turned on me.
Surely....SURELY this suggests that all of Nick's friends turned against him,
It would to new players. There are other quotes but I'm not going to comb the script all night :/
Quote:
maybe didn't hear it straight from him also knowing Edgeworth's hatred of forged evidence (because of what it did to his reputation) and love of Justice would hate Phoenix for it,
You think she wouldn't believe him when he did tell her about it though? Edgeworth isn't naive enough to think that there isn't endemic corruption in the legal system and the games establish there's mutual trust and respect, I think he'd believe Phoenix if he said he was set up. Phoenix didn't abandon Edgeworth after Edgeworth presented forged evidence or in 1-4 so I'm sure Edgeworth would return the favour and believe his word over Klavier.
Quote:
Firstly there's nothing to suggest Maya has been friends with Nick the past 7 years and so have associated with Kristoph thats a massive coincidence your utilising especially based on the quote saying everyone had turned on him.
Wasn't based on the quote. 'Nothing to prove' just proves my point of the problem. Maya Has Ceased To Exist = Inexplicable. Ah, but in our Easter Egg, if they aren't friends, why is he watching the DVDs? Why is there a 4th Samurai series from
after the ones in game 3? Why is he writing reports?
(I get it. Phoenix likes to go on 'grape juice' hallucinations and 'fingerprint powder' trips in which he pretends Maya is still with him, and really sends himself the DVDs.)Quote:
Secondly Nick only knew Kristoph had set him up during the present of 4-4 when he was already in jail, before that he had just gotten Apollo to put Kristoph away to punish him for killing Shadi (thus ensuring Justice is served) and so that he could reunite Apollo with Trucy. He'd have no reason to protect Maya from Kristoph he was a kind friend before that,
Kristoph: "Even from the beginning, you suspected me..."Oh come on. It was
not some fluffy friendship for 6 of the 7 years.
Well yeah, there's another 'theory' some people like to throw around: Phoenix/Kristoph, in a literal relationship sense, either Phoenix whoring himself out to get the truth or genuinely deluded, at the expense of his other relationships. I didn't invent it, and I really don't want to see it.... And why has he been running round with that
spy camera pre 4-
1?
Quote:
Impossible, the fact that Kristoph had ruined Phoenix was only discovered late in AJ, she'd have no reason to be present in the game due to rage at Kristoph since its a hidden secret for most of the game.
Hidden from dumb Apollo. Phoenix reveals next to nothing to Apollo (easier to manipulate him, I guess) but there's nothing to say he
couldn't be a closer confidant to other characters such as Maya, even Trucy gets to know way more than Apollo so it's very precedented. You just voided your own argument about how we only know from Apollo's perspective etc.
Quote:
As for the suggestion they died? Thats laughable really...it is. And also anything is possible if you remove the other factors, but the DVD reference is there and the potential for Edgeworth being referenced later as well.
I don't quite see the point of what we're arguing here... I
already said the DVD scene implies Maya is alive (so why argue over a moot point), but let's
pretend momentarily the DVD scene wasn't Maya:
The entire precedent of the first 3 games has been Maya helping Phoenix investigate cases. Even if she's no longer officially Legal Assistant, Maya would be outraged somebody (whoever they were) set up Phoenix to destroy him and eager to help the investigation into the truth to clear his name, just as she has always done in the past.
You can't deny this is a reasonable assumption based on games 1-3? And in those games, she consistently gets Phoenix the vital evidence, often at great personal
risk and
danger. Another precedent continually set.
And thirdly, (aside from the DVD scene, which we are pretending is eliminated) she does not appear to exist any more, therefore maybe she is indeed no longer alive - eliminated, unable to help Phoenix (since this would explain why she isn't.) Maybe she yet again found the vital evidence at great personal risk - so let's see Kristophs' precedents presented in-game. Why look! He
murders people who might expose him like Drew, [attempted] Vera, Zak[?] etc. Perhaps he coudl have eliminated Maya when she found something threatened to expose him?
This reasoning is perfectly supportable. It's a theory, but not a deniable one, supported by the canon of
both arcs - except, of course, that the DVD scene DOES exist, and therefore, as I originally said, the otherwise-plausible theory is ruled out.
Quote:
What you said right there at the end....'Edgeworth's involvement would have made sense' so why do you assume he didn't have some involvement? ... This definately suggests Edgeworth was involved..
That's my point! The decision of never implying the old characters exist is carried out to the point of UTTER RIDICULOUSNESS, it would
not be fanservice or pandering to allude to Edgeworth here, it would quickly fill an
utterly ridiculous plot failure with virtually no effort, yet the writers are so set on implying the old arc has somehow disappeared (expect Phoenix) they don't reference him, even indirectly, even in this blatantly worthwhile case. It makes as much non-sense to the NEW players
not to mention Edgeworth here, and yet they're so set on advancing this depressing state of affairs that the old chars no longer exist to bear on the plot that they don't.
Quote:
I don't see your point by saying 'Too bad' Edgeworth and Maya weren't mentioned by name in AJ so they won't lose any sleep wondering about it.
Um, you mean the writers won't lose sleep? A lot of fans missed Maya, Edgeworth, and the fact that Phoenix had, you know, close friendships with them? And the fans are the ones who buy games, pay money, spread hype and make success for the writers. If fans are too unhappy, the writers
will lose sleep because people will quit the series.
Quote:
Your acting like it's PW4 and not Apollo Justice 1 we don't need to know about Phoenix's past cases as much, maybe a little minor interest in GS1 because Ema was brought back, but the rest is not important especially since Apollo will be making his own legacy now.
It's
not AJ1. It's
GS4. It's the SAME series. If it was indeed AJ1 (GS-the second series!) then Phoenix would have not returned or only for a small cameo with limited impact on the previous series.
Backstory of Phoenix Wright GS4:Phoenix was a lawyer for 3 years. Anything which happened in those 3 years is functionally irrelevant. Any connection or relationships to other characters have also functionally ceased to exist. The sole exception is one case (1-5) where Phoenix saved Ema from some trouble, and she is still grateful for it and respects him. Other characters or events from his past do not play a role in Phoenix's life, even as unspecified friends implied off-screen.
Oh, and his mentor had a plant, but not a name. So I guess we know he had a mentor. But she can't have been a very good one because he just acted like an OOC arrogant prick and made a stupid mistake bordering on insanity the moment she left him.This should have been adjusted. It should have been IMPLIED that Phoenix has connections to other, unspecified characters off-screen who are FRIENDS/'associates', who help him with his 'secret missions' and such. So easy and would have made his character so much more believable as a possible follow-up to 1-3. Because his friends
would have helped him out.
The rest
is important because they brought
Phoenix back. Therefore, because Phoenix is there in a major way,
believable characterisation for Phoenix is REQUIRED for the games to meet any minimum standard of decency. In game 1-3 Phoenix was shown as a character who revolved around his friends, even before he was a lawyer, and disbarring is not going to remove that character facet OR his past. That's why some people claim it's an AU, that it isn't really Phoenix.. they
can't reconcile this poor characterisation with the char in 1-3 because it's not written as a believable follow-up.
Quote:
if let's say hypothetically in GS5-5(bonus case) is regarded as a better end to the series then GS5-4 (Actual end) then people will demand more Phoenix as a lawyer and there will be more incentive to bring him back and thus crush Apollo into the dirt again. This problem can be avoided completely if Nick doesn't get his old job back.
So your sole argument against this idea is:
"Some people might like a token case tacked onto the end featuring Phoenix better than 4 whole cases and their far greater opportunity to build up an epic plot. NOBODY should
ever be 'allowed' to like something featuring Phoenix better than something featuring Apollo, therefore, Phoenix isn't 'allowed' to have a case, because some fans might *heaven forbid*
like it!"
Quote:
How do we know he pays him in pudding? Theres no evidence, and the presenting forged evidence and putting him down was all to make sure he came out stronger. ...
Yeah, but nothing you said actually countered any point I made. I said it had short-term benefits to Apollo, but this is not a functional 'mentor' relationship.
You're right. Trucy even ate his pudding.
Apollo:...Try not to eat my share, will you?
Apollo: Um... I was wondering when I get paid?
[...]
Phoenix:
I'd be happy to help with anything not involving money.Quote:
Everything Nick did he believed was important for Apollo, plus Nick said he'd look after Apollo and Trucy and I think your underestimating what a nice gesture reuniting long lost brothers and sisters is, that makes him a good guy by a long shot....
Phoenix
is a lovely guy. However, his entire attitude to Apollo isn't very nice or positive, I think he has difficulty being around him. It
hurts not to be a lawyer and to have degenerated to exploiting Apollo by necessity. It's only decency that he'd pay some kind of attention to watching out for Trucy's BROTHER, given what he knows and since Thalassa is so uncaring she seems to want little to do with him. Wanting to take reasonable attention to Apollo's welfare is totally different to wanting to be a 'mentor' to him in a legal career sense. It is plain Phoenix does NOT, and probably resents having to use him.
As I said, the mentoring in game 4 had SHORT TERM benefit for both of them, but in the medium-long term I can only see more negatives than positives for BOTH characters in any attempted 'mentor' relationship. It's
not like Phoenix-Mia and it never
can be. And it never will be, if they continue with their policy of 'differentiating' things in this arc. Meh, okay, Phoenix sticking around as a 'mentor'
logically points to a degeneration and MAJOR messy falling-out. Is this useful to the series? Some people actually like this idea and even suggest it, but I bet a lot of other people would hate it - and it would carry 'Phoenix
vs Apollo' to eternity. Further dividing the fanbase is ridiculous for the franchise.
Quote:

This is fun!
Yeah, but I'm not sure we're getting anywhere, arguing every little point isn't getting much closer to 'solving' the 'problem' (not that we
can 'solve' it but, the fanbase has various 'issues' and..)
*sigh* I fear we're straying OT and this is getting unproductiveAnd I also have a reply to Gerkuman!... later (this is too long)