Re: I'd like a case where...
Why HER!? Why HERE!? Why NOW!?
Gender: Female
Location: South Italy. Not the Hetalia one.
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 77
Scatterbrain wrote:
And a case involving Apollo's background. :<
Oh yeah, it will obviously be present, for a simple reason: who is Apollo's father?Maybe he's not dead, maybe he'll be the victim of the first case of AJ2 and you will know only in the last case...
Writing, drawing, singing, flashing, playing, for you. Stay lawed ♪.
Re: I'd like a case where...
Gender: None specified
Rank: Suspect
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:00 pm
Posts: 36
GigaHand wrote:
I'd like a final case where the final, climactic piece of evidence is
Spoiler:
Holy- Why have they not done this yet?
It makes so much sense!
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Stand back! I'm about to try SCIENCE!
Gender: Female
Location: Here. No wait, I meant there! Or In florida! Don't Hurt MEEE!
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:20 pm
Posts: 146
Like, he's actually become a decent illustrator and made a name for himself. It would be a cameo, yes, but think about how interesting you could play the Successful!Larry/Hobo!Phoenix relationship? It's also a much less involved cameo than having the Feys back.
Re: I'd like a case where...
Your friendly, neighborhood eccentric =]
Gender: None specified
Location: "Boxy Town"
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 2:00 am
Posts: 65
KyrieNobody wrote:
[size=75]Or a crime in a hospital? Or in Prosecution's house? The Courthouse crimes already exist...
Spoiler: AJ4
Re: I'd like a case where...
Your friendly, neighborhood eccentric =]
Gender: None specified
Location: "Boxy Town"
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 2:00 am
Posts: 65
Hikka wrote:
KyrieNobody wrote:
Or a crime in a hospital? Or in Prosecution's house? The Courthouse crimes already exist...
Spoiler: AJ4
Re: I'd like a case where...
Why HER!? Why HERE!? Why NOW!?
Gender: Female
Location: South Italy. Not the Hetalia one.
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 77
Hikka wrote:
KyrieNobody wrote:
Or a crime in a hospital? Or in Prosecution's house? The Courthouse crimes already exist...
Spoiler: AJ4
Writing, drawing, singing, flashing, playing, for you. Stay lawed ♪.
Re: I'd like a case where...
Walking the path of heaven, ruler of all
Gender: Male
Location: sweden
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:27 pm
Posts: 1163
Another epic case would be where a guy dies at a mahjong table. Three people are playing. Suddenly after the last game the lights go out. The kille take up his gun and shoot the victim and then drop the gun on the table so no-one will know who did the killing.
Awesome sig made by Nadindi.
My otp's are. MayaxLarry and PhoenixxFranziska
Re: I'd like a case where...
Gender: Female
Location: Connecticut
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 8:36 pm
Posts: 103
Re: I'd like a case where...
Callipygous nelipot
Gender: None specified
Rank: Suspect
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:26 pm
Posts: 11
KyrieNobody wrote:
Rantzien wrote:
I would like a case where you have to cross-examine the judge.
Spoiler:
Hah, I got to that part shortly after making that post. Neat coincidence!
Re: I'd like a case where...
Miles Edgeworth is something else
Gender: Female
Location: Where am I? Borginia?
Rank: Suspect
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:34 am
Posts: 19
.gif)
OBJECTION! That was... objectionable!
Re: I'd like a case where...
IT'S GANT TIME
Gender: Female
Location: York, UK
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:26 pm
Posts: 75
I accidentally the signature
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Till the landslide brought me down...
Gender: Female
Location: Sydney
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:03 pm
Posts: 1198
• °♦ ♥ ♦° .*•. ♫~.•* • °♦ ♥ ♦° .*•. ♫~.•*• °♦ ♥ ♦°
Re: I'd like a case where...
OBJECTION!
Gender: Male
Location: St. Albans, England, UK
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:18 am
Posts: 2602
Nick and Maya - Friends and Lovers....
Re: I'd like a case where...
ALL GLORY TO... SOMETHING
Gender: Male
Location: Not in a courtroom, that's where.
Rank: Prosecutor
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 914
Bluesky wrote:
I'd like a case where one of the crucial witnesses gets murdered aways into the case. That would be pretty cool for drama and could turn the whole plot of that case around.
They half-did it in 4-3 with Lamiroir, but I would like to see a case like this. Bring it!
EDIT: I'd also like to see a case where you find a lead in the form of a person. All you know is their name, and that they're "some sorta stage guy". A performer, if you will. If you present their profile to Valant, you get this response.
Spoiler:
"Know him? I am him."
Re: I'd like a case where...
Moving on up!
Gender: Female
Location: USA
Rank: Donor
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 5333
Thanks to Blinq for the awesome sig. Click the sig, see my stuff.
Edgeworth/Maya Community. A friends, as lovers, as part of OT3s. All Welcome.
"Yeah, I wouldn't go asking random guys if you can lick their penor." crouton December 2009
Re: I'd like a case where...
SMASHING DAY FOR A BARBEQUE.
Gender: Male
Location: The Land of Tea and Crumpets...England.
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 1564
And a case revolving around waffles, pancakes or BOTH. Because they're awesome.
Re: I'd like a case where...
Scary Cat
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Rank: Decisive Witness
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:22 pm
Posts: 226
Scarred_owl wrote:
I want a case where some of the people are robots (Prof. Layton inspired, yes, but whatever)
You mean Miss Basil doesn't count? 
I really want a case where a decisive witness is Narcoleptic, which means he'll fall asleep when he gets too excited. I can see the dialog now...
Prosecutor: *Deskslam* "You saw the murderer didn't you? WHO DID YOU SEE?"
Witness: "You bet I saw him! IT WAS...... Zzzzzzzzzzzzz"
Prosecutor: "...."
Defence: "...."
Judge: "...."
Audience: "...."
Witness: "...... *wakes up* Huh? What was I saying again?"
That would be so exploitable for a running gag. XD
Avatar/Signature sprites done by good folk at Crystal Gun Girl Game
Re: I'd like a case where...
OBJECTION!
Gender: Male
Location: St. Albans, England, UK
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:18 am
Posts: 2602
Nick and Maya - Friends and Lovers....
Re: I'd like a case where...
Scary Cat
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Rank: Decisive Witness
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:22 pm
Posts: 226
Avatar/Signature sprites done by good folk at Crystal Gun Girl Game
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Call me Ishmael.
Gender: Male
Location: Sweden
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:16 pm
Posts: 2434
Wife: sparkleranger78, daughter: feedmechocolate247
Re: Any cases ideas ?
1000% Knight
Gender: Male
Rank: Moderators
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:06 pm
Posts: 6932
Marche Tobaye wrote:
I want a case where the villain wants to smuggle a poisonous flower or something to another country.
Eh... After smuggling in AJ and smuggling in AAI, I dunno if I want smuggling in GS5.
Credit to Evolina for the sig+avatar!
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Why HER!? Why HERE!? Why NOW!?
Gender: Female
Location: South Italy. Not the Hetalia one.
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 77
Or: the decisive witness is a killer in jail and he can't go in the courtroom... so, Vera should forge some papers to get him out.
Or: Franziska as defendant?
Or: murder in a churc!
Or: Trucy as defendant.
Or: the victim of 5-1 is a broker. In 5-4 or 5-5 we'll discover he was Apollo's father.
Or: an old, old, old, old case with loads of fire with a 10-year-old kid as only witness, his granfather as victim, his uncle (disappeared after the crime) as killer, his father as defendant and the only one who believes him is the defense attorney, Gregory Edgeworth (I said it's an old case, uh), and his mother, a magician. That would be killed by Apollo's father. Duh. Then the killing uncle would disguise himself as a defense attorney ad would be Kristoph's master, but his other pupil, Kristoph's "best friend" would discover the truth and the killing uncle kills him too. And only the 10-year-old guy, that now is a 42-year-old prosecutor (But Also Not) is able to catch him, with Apollo Justice's and Phoenix Wright's help.
Or: in the last case, the main prosecutor is the... victim.
Or: a famous doctor is suspected to have killed a patient, injecting a deathly serum.
Or: a doctor accidentally let a patient die, a very special patient, that had a terrible disease as other six children, and when the brother of that guy awakes from a long coma, a very long one (he fell in coma protecting his brother from a bioterroristic company), he tries to kill the doctor, but kills another doctor.
Or: read again the one with the 10-year-old guy; when he's 42, he looks for the help of an old family friend to protect the evidences from that case, and the killing uncle kills this guy too.
Or: Diego's brother as defendant. Hoping the victim is not Diego himself...
Or: Kay as defendant (the killer is... or a stupid guy, or Shi-Long Lang. Sorry, I'd love him anyway).
... no more ideas D:
Writing, drawing, singing, flashing, playing, for you. Stay lawed ♪.
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Call me Ishmael.
Gender: Male
Location: Sweden
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:16 pm
Posts: 2434
Bad Player wrote:
Marche Tobaye wrote:
I want a case where the villain wants to smuggle a poisonous flower or something to another country.
Eh... After smuggling in AJ and smuggling in AAI, I dunno if I want smuggling in GS5.
You're right about the smuggling thing being overused but I really like the deadly flower idea (which I got from Advance Wars: Days of Ruin/Dual Strike).
Spoiler: AAI
Wife: sparkleranger78, daughter: feedmechocolate247
Re: Any cases ideas ?
1000% Knight
Gender: Male
Rank: Moderators
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:06 pm
Posts: 6932
Marche Tobaye wrote:
Bad Player wrote:
Marche Tobaye wrote:
I want a case where the villain wants to smuggle a poisonous flower or something to another country.
Eh... After smuggling in AJ and smuggling in AAI, I dunno if I want smuggling in GS5.
You're right about the smuggling thing being overused but I really like the deadly flower idea (which I got from Advance Wars: Days of Ruin/Dual Strike).
Spoiler: AAI
Spoiler: 4-3
Upping the stakes would definitely be interesting :3
Credit to Evolina for the sig+avatar!
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Why HER!? Why HERE!? Why NOW!?
Gender: Female
Location: South Italy. Not the Hetalia one.
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 77
Marche Tobaye wrote:
Bad Player wrote:
Marche Tobaye wrote:
I want a case where the villain wants to smuggle a poisonous flower or something to another country.
Eh... After smuggling in AJ and smuggling in AAI, I dunno if I want smuggling in GS5.
You're right about the smuggling thing being overused but I really like the deadly flower idea (which I got from Advance Wars: Days of Ruin/Dual Strike).
Spoiler: AAI
Smuggling deadly flowers? Maybe something that would be related to Dahlia (name of a flower, what a coincidence!)... maybe "that" poison comes from this poisoned flower? In this case, it would be just like the cocoon smuggling: it's forbidden to cultivate that flower since "that" episode (or another episode, I dunno) but now someone has used the flower to kill someone...
And: a case involving a red ring of DOOM. I dunno how, but I want a red ring of DOOM, better if it can explode.
Writing, drawing, singing, flashing, playing, for you. Stay lawed ♪.
Re: Any cases ideas ?
1000% Knight
Gender: Male
Rank: Moderators
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:06 pm
Posts: 6932
...and it's red :3
Credit to Evolina for the sig+avatar!
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Gettin' Old!
Gender: Male
Location: Scotland
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:30 pm
Posts: 14363
Bad Player wrote:
Maybe there's a secret message inscribed on the inside of the ring, and it's either (a) what the killer is trying to get, or (b) the final present/evidence (somehow)
...and it's red :3
...and it's red :3
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them,
One ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
The killer is a Ringwraith this inscription is all that Apollo needs to conclude that it was the killer's true goal. Through his intense knowledge of Middle Earth lore (having cosplayed as Legolas himself sometimes) he knows that the Wraith's excuse "That ring belongs to Sauron, it's not mine why would I want it?" doesn't hold water against their intense burning for the ring. The Wraith then tries to claim the ring is a fake.
The climax? Apollo dons the ring and disappears proving the ring real and causing the Wraith to go berserk (for an epic breakdown sequence) before Courtroom Security restrains him and takes him into custody.
Whether or not Apollo gets addicted to the power of the ring is up to the storytellers.
Made by Chesu+Zombee
You thought you could be safe in your courts, with your laws and attorneys to protect you. In this world only I am law, my word is fact, my power is absolute.
Re: Any cases ideas ?
1000% Knight
Gender: Male
Rank: Moderators
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:06 pm
Posts: 6932
Pierre wrote:
Bad Player wrote:
Maybe there's a secret message inscribed on the inside of the ring, and it's either (a) what the killer is trying to get, or (b) the final present/evidence (somehow)
...and it's red :3
...and it's red :3
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them,
One ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
The killer is a Ringwraith this inscription is all that Apollo needs to conclude that it was the killer's true goal. Through his intense knowledge of Middle Earth lore (having cosplayed as Legolas himself sometimes) he knows that the Wraith's excuse "That ring belongs to Sauron, it's not mine why would I want it?" doesn't hold water against their intense burning for the ring. The Wraith then tries to claim the ring is a fake.
The climax? Apollo dons the ring and disappears proving the ring real and causing the Wraith to go berserk (for an epic breakdown sequence) before Courtroom Security restrains him and takes him into custody.
Whether or not Apollo gets addicted to the power of the ring is up to the storytellers.
That would be a fun crossover :D
Credit to Evolina for the sig+avatar!
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Why HER!? Why HERE!? Why NOW!?
Gender: Female
Location: South Italy. Not the Hetalia one.
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 77
Pierre wrote:
Bad Player wrote:
Maybe there's a secret message inscribed on the inside of the ring, and it's either (a) what the killer is trying to get, or (b) the final present/evidence (somehow)
...and it's red :3
...and it's red :3
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them,
One ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
The killer is a Ringwraith this inscription is all that Apollo needs to conclude that it was the killer's true goal. Through his intense knowledge of Middle Earth lore (having cosplayed as Legolas himself sometimes) he knows that the Wraith's excuse "That ring belongs to Sauron, it's not mine why would I want it?" doesn't hold water against their intense burning for the ring. The Wraith then tries to claim the ring is a fake.
The climax? Apollo dons the ring and disappears proving the ring real and causing the Wraith to go berserk (for an epic breakdown sequence) before Courtroom Security restrains him and takes him into custody.
Whether or not Apollo gets addicted to the power of the ring is up to the storytellers.
Amen (I love LOTR <3)
Hey, wait a second.. Apollo's Perceive Power IS a red ring of DOOM.
Spoiler:
Writing, drawing, singing, flashing, playing, for you. Stay lawed ♪.
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Gender: Male
Rank: Decisive Witness
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:49 pm
Posts: 150
My twist for the case was that Flynn had a pre-existing heart condition, and the adrenaline from the magnificent fight Gutsen gave him was apparently enough to give him a heart attack in the last moments of the fight - this lowered his guard, allowing Gutsen's knock out punch to connect, and while the referee was counting, Flynn died of heart failure. This twist effectively means that Gutsen is declared Not Guilty, and also that there is no "true" killer (though one shady witness is brought in for questioning when it's revealed in court that he was attempting to have the fight "fixed").
My proudest moment when writing the case was the character Enzo Spyke, based on many famous sports commentators including John Madden. He constantly wears a headset and carries a newscaster's microphone, sports a pretty awesome butt-chin, and is always talking in sports commentary...even in court.
<Apollo> Take that!
<Spyke> Ooooh, another vicious swing from Justice!
<Apollo> ...Swing? I was just getting out this evidence...
<Spyke> And accompanied by his trademark trash talk! Apollo Justice is clearly not going down without a fight, folks!
<Judge> Mr. Spyke, would you kindly cease the color commentary? That's my job...
"Overall, I give it an eight out of ten, but only because it was made in China, and I am terrified of their government."
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Two more games coming up soon
Gender: Male
Location: Paris
Rank: Prosecutor
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:45 pm
Posts: 929
Creator of Apollo Justice Case 5: Turnabout Substitution: Trailer - Download
Co-creator of New Year's Turnabout, Turnabout Revolution, and At Dawn's Break
Co-creator of New Year's Turnabout, Turnabout Revolution, and At Dawn's Break
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Mipeltaja = the real badass
Gender: Male
Location: That one place. No, not that place, the other place.
Rank: Medium-in-training
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:14 am
Posts: 462
wildweasel wrote:
This twist effectively means that Gutsen is declared Not Guilty, and also that there is no "true" killer (though one shady witness is brought in for questioning when it's revealed in court that he was attempting to have the fight "fixed").
Eh, I don't know that this would work. Most of the fun in Ace Attorney comes from finding a murderer and making him or her crack, it's no fun discovering a pre-existing heart condition.
I do like the idea of a color commentator-type character being a witness, though.
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Gettin' Old!
Gender: Male
Location: Scotland
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:30 pm
Posts: 14363
wildweasel wrote:
One case idea I had originally brainstormed for what was to be an Edgeworth-centric alternate universe fan game...T&T Case 3 (I think?) mentions a certain name a few times: a famous boxer named Gutsen Brawn. This case focused on Gutsen Brawn as a defendant - true to his name, he's a pretty tough guy, at the expense of some intelligence due to numerous head-poundings. The case centers around Gutsen's return to the world of professional boxing after a few years of absence, as he is challenged by rookie Flynn Butterby (the pun: Fly like a butterfly, sting like a bee...yes I know that's not the exact quote). Thing is, though, while Gutsen wins the fight, it's only because Flynn is apparently killed by Gutsen's last punch. And so, Apollo has to look into other possible reasons that Flynn would have died during the fight, outside of Gutsen going "overboard."
My twist for the case was that Flynn had a pre-existing heart condition, and the adrenaline from the magnificent fight Gutsen gave him was apparently enough to give him a heart attack in the last moments of the fight - this lowered his guard, allowing Gutsen's knock out punch to connect, and while the referee was counting, Flynn died of heart failure. This twist effectively means that Gutsen is declared Not Guilty, and also that there is no "true" killer (though one shady witness is brought in for questioning when it's revealed in court that he was attempting to have the fight "fixed").
My proudest moment when writing the case was the character Enzo Spyke, based on many famous sports commentators including John Madden. He constantly wears a headset and carries a newscaster's microphone, sports a pretty awesome butt-chin, and is always talking in sports commentary...even in court.
<Apollo> Take that!
<Spyke> Ooooh, another vicious swing from Justice!
<Apollo> ...Swing? I was just getting out this evidence...
<Spyke> And accompanied by his trademark trash talk! Apollo Justice is clearly not going down without a fight, folks!
<Judge> Mr. Spyke, would you kindly cease the color commentary? That's my job...
My twist for the case was that Flynn had a pre-existing heart condition, and the adrenaline from the magnificent fight Gutsen gave him was apparently enough to give him a heart attack in the last moments of the fight - this lowered his guard, allowing Gutsen's knock out punch to connect, and while the referee was counting, Flynn died of heart failure. This twist effectively means that Gutsen is declared Not Guilty, and also that there is no "true" killer (though one shady witness is brought in for questioning when it's revealed in court that he was attempting to have the fight "fixed").
My proudest moment when writing the case was the character Enzo Spyke, based on many famous sports commentators including John Madden. He constantly wears a headset and carries a newscaster's microphone, sports a pretty awesome butt-chin, and is always talking in sports commentary...even in court.
<Apollo> Take that!
<Spyke> Ooooh, another vicious swing from Justice!
<Apollo> ...Swing? I was just getting out this evidence...
<Spyke> And accompanied by his trademark trash talk! Apollo Justice is clearly not going down without a fight, folks!
<Judge> Mr. Spyke, would you kindly cease the color commentary? That's my job...
Tis good but I still think you need a main villain.
Maybe someone who fabricated evidence to make it look like Gutsen had motive and had planned to kill Butterby in the fight all along.
Made by Chesu+Zombee
You thought you could be safe in your courts, with your laws and attorneys to protect you. In this world only I am law, my word is fact, my power is absolute.
Re: Any cases ideas ?
1000% Knight
Gender: Male
Rank: Moderators
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:06 pm
Posts: 6932
Credit to Evolina for the sig+avatar!
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Why HER!? Why HERE!? Why NOW!?
Gender: Female
Location: South Italy. Not the Hetalia one.
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 77
Bad Player wrote:
The main villain should be Polly. Duh.
Oh no.
The main villain should be... PHOENIX WRIGHT!
Or someone that lets all the previous murderers free and calls back the dead ones. That would mean another family of channellers: I doubt that any Fey spirit medium wants to know anything else about Morgan and Dahlia... expecially Pearl.
Anyway, I made a case that would include the attorney's badge as evidence: there's a photo that shows the murderer, the prosecutor's youngest brother, with a gun and a badge on him chest, and the prosecutor claims to be his accomplice and let him use his gun and his badge, to help him to stealth... but Apollo objects and shows that the badge can't be the prosecutor's one, because it looks exactly like a DEFENSE and not a PROSECUTION attorney's badge. And we previously know that the prosecutor has heart problems, critical enough to surgically insert a pump in his chest... that outside looks exactly like a defense attorney's badge. So, the murderer is (what a coincidence) the prosecutor, not his brother.
Said like this looks nosense, but the case I created is more logical and reasonable, trust me :D
Writing, drawing, singing, flashing, playing, for you. Stay lawed ♪.
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Payne has a child called Lauren Alotta
Gender: Male
Rank: Suspect
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:31 am
Posts: 35
An escaped convict (A.) runs away from two police members (B. & C.) a few minutes before the start of the new year. A. finds a burning building nearby and thinks that this would be enough of a distraction for the cops to get away. He runs into the alleyway nearby when he hears a voice in the building yelling for help. Thinking that this can be a hostage in case his previous plan doesn't succeed, he tries to "help" the man (D.) by pulling the burning door open. However, by that time, the cops come by and one of them (B.) shoots the convict to hinder him. The shot was too high though and kills A. instantaously. B. shoots a second time before the convict faints to the ground, but it doesn't have an effect on the murder.
So where does the defending part come in? Well it turns out that A. and B. had an affair beforehand and ended it when the convict went to jail. C. thinks that those shots weren't accidental and was really meant to kill the convict, while D. is too freaked out to remember what exactly happened. You have to prove that she didn't kill him for reasons besides her duties to hinder the subject if they escape.
Seeing that this is probably a fourth or fifth case, there is more than meets the eye. For example, C. doesn't actually witness the female's first shot and instead is at focus of another convict (E.) who was at the opposite side of the street with the same type of gun the police uses. When C. hears the first gunshot, he turns to see B. giving another shot, then back to find E. running away. C. then runs to get E. but when he finally catches him, the gun is missing. When he goes back to the originaly crime scene, C. finds that B.'s gun is missing as well.
And that's just part one of this case... There are more witness, more testimonies, more breakouts, and eventually, a third killer that no one will ever except (or rather not want to believe as the truth).
Think it's crazy?
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Toffee!
Gender: Male
Rank: Suspect
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:46 pm
Posts: 30
Kits U. wrote:
Crazy idea, stop me if you think it's too out of there. (thinking of using this as a fanfic)
An escaped convict (A.) runs away from two police members (B. & C.) a few minutes before the start of the new year. A. finds a burning building nearby and thinks that this would be enough of a distraction for the cops to get away. He runs into the alleyway nearby when he hears a voice in the building yelling for help. Thinking that this can be a hostage in case his previous plan doesn't succeed, he tries to "help" the man (D.) by pulling the burning door open. However, by that time, the cops come by and one of them (B.) shoots the convict to hinder him. The shot was too high though and kills A. instantaously. B. shoots a second time before the convict faints to the ground, but it doesn't have an effect on the murder.
So where does the defending part come in? Well it turns out that A. and B. had an affair beforehand and ended it when the convict went to jail. C. thinks that those shots weren't accidental and was really meant to kill the convict, while D. is too freaked out to remember what exactly happened. You have to prove that she didn't kill him for reasons besides her duties to hinder the subject if they escape.
Seeing that this is probably a fourth or fifth case, there is more than meets the eye. For example, C. doesn't actually witness the female's first shot and instead is at focus of another convict (E.) who was at the opposite side of the street with the same type of gun the police uses. When C. hears the first gunshot, he turns to see B. giving another shot, then back to find E. running away. C. then runs to get E. but when he finally catches him, the gun is missing. When he goes back to the original crime scene, C. finds that B.'s gun is missing as well.
And that's just part one of this case... There are more witness, more testimonies, more breakouts, and eventually, a third killer that no one will ever except (or rather not want to believe as the truth).
Think it's crazy?
An escaped convict (A.) runs away from two police members (B. & C.) a few minutes before the start of the new year. A. finds a burning building nearby and thinks that this would be enough of a distraction for the cops to get away. He runs into the alleyway nearby when he hears a voice in the building yelling for help. Thinking that this can be a hostage in case his previous plan doesn't succeed, he tries to "help" the man (D.) by pulling the burning door open. However, by that time, the cops come by and one of them (B.) shoots the convict to hinder him. The shot was too high though and kills A. instantaously. B. shoots a second time before the convict faints to the ground, but it doesn't have an effect on the murder.
So where does the defending part come in? Well it turns out that A. and B. had an affair beforehand and ended it when the convict went to jail. C. thinks that those shots weren't accidental and was really meant to kill the convict, while D. is too freaked out to remember what exactly happened. You have to prove that she didn't kill him for reasons besides her duties to hinder the subject if they escape.
Seeing that this is probably a fourth or fifth case, there is more than meets the eye. For example, C. doesn't actually witness the female's first shot and instead is at focus of another convict (E.) who was at the opposite side of the street with the same type of gun the police uses. When C. hears the first gunshot, he turns to see B. giving another shot, then back to find E. running away. C. then runs to get E. but when he finally catches him, the gun is missing. When he goes back to the original crime scene, C. finds that B.'s gun is missing as well.
And that's just part one of this case... There are more witness, more testimonies, more breakouts, and eventually, a third killer that no one will ever except (or rather not want to believe as the truth).
Think it's crazy?
Possible, needs to be trimmed down a bit. Seems a bit too winding, but I like it
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Gettin' Old!
Gender: Male
Location: Scotland
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:30 pm
Posts: 14363
yared02 wrote:
Kits U. wrote:
Crazy idea, stop me if you think it's too out of there. (thinking of using this as a fanfic)
An escaped convict (A.) runs away from two police members (B. & C.) a few minutes before the start of the new year. A. finds a burning building nearby and thinks that this would be enough of a distraction for the cops to get away. He runs into the alleyway nearby when he hears a voice in the building yelling for help. Thinking that this can be a hostage in case his previous plan doesn't succeed, he tries to "help" the man (D.) by pulling the burning door open. However, by that time, the cops come by and one of them (B.) shoots the convict to hinder him. The shot was too high though and kills A. instantaously. B. shoots a second time before the convict faints to the ground, but it doesn't have an effect on the murder.
So where does the defending part come in? Well it turns out that A. and B. had an affair beforehand and ended it when the convict went to jail. C. thinks that those shots weren't accidental and was really meant to kill the convict, while D. is too freaked out to remember what exactly happened. You have to prove that she didn't kill him for reasons besides her duties to hinder the subject if they escape.
Seeing that this is probably a fourth or fifth case, there is more than meets the eye. For example, C. doesn't actually witness the female's first shot and instead is at focus of another convict (E.) who was at the opposite side of the street with the same type of gun the police uses. When C. hears the first gunshot, he turns to see B. giving another shot, then back to find E. running away. C. then runs to get E. but when he finally catches him, the gun is missing. When he goes back to the original crime scene, C. finds that B.'s gun is missing as well.
And that's just part one of this case... There are more witness, more testimonies, more breakouts, and eventually, a third killer that no one will ever except (or rather not want to believe as the truth).
Think it's crazy?
An escaped convict (A.) runs away from two police members (B. & C.) a few minutes before the start of the new year. A. finds a burning building nearby and thinks that this would be enough of a distraction for the cops to get away. He runs into the alleyway nearby when he hears a voice in the building yelling for help. Thinking that this can be a hostage in case his previous plan doesn't succeed, he tries to "help" the man (D.) by pulling the burning door open. However, by that time, the cops come by and one of them (B.) shoots the convict to hinder him. The shot was too high though and kills A. instantaously. B. shoots a second time before the convict faints to the ground, but it doesn't have an effect on the murder.
So where does the defending part come in? Well it turns out that A. and B. had an affair beforehand and ended it when the convict went to jail. C. thinks that those shots weren't accidental and was really meant to kill the convict, while D. is too freaked out to remember what exactly happened. You have to prove that she didn't kill him for reasons besides her duties to hinder the subject if they escape.
Seeing that this is probably a fourth or fifth case, there is more than meets the eye. For example, C. doesn't actually witness the female's first shot and instead is at focus of another convict (E.) who was at the opposite side of the street with the same type of gun the police uses. When C. hears the first gunshot, he turns to see B. giving another shot, then back to find E. running away. C. then runs to get E. but when he finally catches him, the gun is missing. When he goes back to the original crime scene, C. finds that B.'s gun is missing as well.
And that's just part one of this case... There are more witness, more testimonies, more breakouts, and eventually, a third killer that no one will ever except (or rather not want to believe as the truth).
Think it's crazy?
Possible, needs to be trimmed down a bit. Seems a bit too winding, but I like it
No no...I think it's just right, if only every AA case had a killer that came out of nowhere.
Made by Chesu+Zombee
You thought you could be safe in your courts, with your laws and attorneys to protect you. In this world only I am law, my word is fact, my power is absolute.
Re: Any cases ideas ?
Why HER!? Why HERE!? Why NOW!?
Gender: Female
Location: South Italy. Not the Hetalia one.
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 77
Pierre wrote:
yared02 wrote:
Kits U. wrote:
Crazy idea, stop me if you think it's too out of there. (thinking of using this as a fanfic)
An escaped convict (A.) runs away from two police members (B. & C.) a few minutes before the start of the new year. A. finds a burning building nearby and thinks that this would be enough of a distraction for the cops to get away. He runs into the alleyway nearby when he hears a voice in the building yelling for help. Thinking that this can be a hostage in case his previous plan doesn't succeed, he tries to "help" the man (D.) by pulling the burning door open. However, by that time, the cops come by and one of them (B.) shoots the convict to hinder him. The shot was too high though and kills A. instantaously. B. shoots a second time before the convict faints to the ground, but it doesn't have an effect on the murder.
So where does the defending part come in? Well it turns out that A. and B. had an affair beforehand and ended it when the convict went to jail. C. thinks that those shots weren't accidental and was really meant to kill the convict, while D. is too freaked out to remember what exactly happened. You have to prove that she didn't kill him for reasons besides her duties to hinder the subject if they escape.
Seeing that this is probably a fourth or fifth case, there is more than meets the eye. For example, C. doesn't actually witness the female's first shot and instead is at focus of another convict (E.) who was at the opposite side of the street with the same type of gun the police uses. When C. hears the first gunshot, he turns to see B. giving another shot, then back to find E. running away. C. then runs to get E. but when he finally catches him, the gun is missing. When he goes back to the original crime scene, C. finds that B.'s gun is missing as well.
And that's just part one of this case... There are more witness, more testimonies, more breakouts, and eventually, a third killer that no one will ever except (or rather not want to believe as the truth).
Think it's crazy?
An escaped convict (A.) runs away from two police members (B. & C.) a few minutes before the start of the new year. A. finds a burning building nearby and thinks that this would be enough of a distraction for the cops to get away. He runs into the alleyway nearby when he hears a voice in the building yelling for help. Thinking that this can be a hostage in case his previous plan doesn't succeed, he tries to "help" the man (D.) by pulling the burning door open. However, by that time, the cops come by and one of them (B.) shoots the convict to hinder him. The shot was too high though and kills A. instantaously. B. shoots a second time before the convict faints to the ground, but it doesn't have an effect on the murder.
So where does the defending part come in? Well it turns out that A. and B. had an affair beforehand and ended it when the convict went to jail. C. thinks that those shots weren't accidental and was really meant to kill the convict, while D. is too freaked out to remember what exactly happened. You have to prove that she didn't kill him for reasons besides her duties to hinder the subject if they escape.
Seeing that this is probably a fourth or fifth case, there is more than meets the eye. For example, C. doesn't actually witness the female's first shot and instead is at focus of another convict (E.) who was at the opposite side of the street with the same type of gun the police uses. When C. hears the first gunshot, he turns to see B. giving another shot, then back to find E. running away. C. then runs to get E. but when he finally catches him, the gun is missing. When he goes back to the original crime scene, C. finds that B.'s gun is missing as well.
And that's just part one of this case... There are more witness, more testimonies, more breakouts, and eventually, a third killer that no one will ever except (or rather not want to believe as the truth).
Think it's crazy?
Possible, needs to be trimmed down a bit. Seems a bit too winding, but I like it
No no...I think it's just right, if only every AA case had a killer that came out of nowhere.
What if the killer is the first case's defendant, that becomes your assistant instead of Trucy and Phoenix? So, the killer is definitely NOT out from nowhere, but actually you accidentally helped him/her to protect him/herself from the jail!
Writing, drawing, singing, flashing, playing, for you. Stay lawed ♪.
Re: Any cases ideas ?
1000% Knight
Gender: Male
Rank: Moderators
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:06 pm
Posts: 6932
Anyway, this has probably been suggested before, but I think it would be cool to have a case where the murderer is the victim. (That is, s/he commits suicide, but sets it up to frame the defendant as an act of revenge.)
Credit to Evolina for the sig+avatar!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
News
Site map
SitemapIndex
RSS Feed