Don't call me Shirley
Gender: Male
Location: France
Rank: Decisive Witness
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:53 pm
Posts: 168
jrdngdwn wrote:
Hmm... maybe you could work in a part when the victim was thought to be killed a certain way (Way 1), but it actually turned out to be another certain way (Way 2) and the real killer manipulated the body to make it look like Way 1 instead of Way 2 in order to throw off the investigation. Way 1 should be the victim being killed by acid.
Way 2 should be the victim getting shot.
How it should be revealed is the main character (
) would discover that the acid melts any gun bullets, and throw of the cause of death to make it look like they were killed by acid.
I like the idea of a sophisticated murder method actually used for a specific purpose, like hiding the real murder method. Too often is the murder "creative" just for the sake of being gross or sounding unique. But as pointed out above, the amount of acid AND time required to dissolve a bullet would be much too massive to leave much of the body itself behind, and to be convenient for the killer. If your killer pulls out an intricate way of offing his victim, always make sure he has a good reason of doing so, and above all, that it was the
easiest method to achieve what he wanted ! Your reader shouldn't be able to say "why did he go through so much trouble when really he could have just ______".
Generally, your kind of idea works fine when the killer has very limited time and means to disguise his crime. It's easier for the reader to buy (and for you to justify) an intricate plan if the killer killed without premeditation, and had only a few minutes and no place to go to pin it on somebody else, or to try to fool the other characters regarding the time/method of death. If the killer has all the time in the world and can go everywhere he wants and get any item he needs, well he's better off completely destroying the corpse or burning down the crime scene !
Are the death by gunshot/acid relevant to the rest of your plot, are are they just placeholder methods ? I think you could keep the general idea but with two more realistic methods. To give you an example close to what you first envisioned, imagine a killer stabbing his victim with an ice stalacticte, and then placing his victim in a hot bath to make the crime weapon vanish. Of course the credibility of such of plot would entirely depend on the context (an ice stalactite isn't what you first think of to kill your victim, and a bath isn't the easiest way to conceal ice). To come up with something more relevant, I'd need to know more about the rest of the plot. How much do you know about the rest of your story ?
JesusMonroe wrote:
I'll bite. A man is in witness protection before a big trial (it's a cabin in the woods). He gets killed inside the cabin. The police officers surrounding the area never saw anyone enter the cabin.
No secret passages and nobody disguising as a police officer
Aha, closed rooms mysteries
one of the more riveting kind of murders...in the few occurrences where they're done right !
The whole dilemma of the genre is as follows : either the killer somehow managed to enter/leave the room, but that means it wasn't completely closed ; or the room
was closed, but that means the killer never entered it in the first place, and what actually happened was :
- a suicide
- an accident
- the victim was wounded outside, locked the room and died inside
- the killer set a trap beforehand
- the victim was poisoned
- the killer killed the victim directly, but from outside the room
- there was only one key, used by the killer to lock the room from outside, and then replaced inside from outside the room
- the room really wasn't locked, but the killer was the first to enter the room and pretended he couldn't open it
This list should basically tell you what has been done to death. Also, some people (including myself) believe that it's cheating to spend the whole story presenting the problem as "how did the killer enter/leave the room", when actually he never did. Now when I read a detective novel where the closed room is a little too clear cut, to the point you can tell it was physically impossible for the killer to move inside/outside, I know he never even was inside in the first place.
So, what you have to do is make a mystery where the locked room problem is a little more subtle, or results from specific circumstances that may seem random at first, when really the murder couldn't have happened without them. Do you have any further information regarding the setting of the story or the cabin where the murder takes place ?