Board index » Phoenix Wright » Defendant's Lobby » Hazakurain (GS3)

Page 2 of 4[ 141 posts ]
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 


Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title
User avatar

Lolwut?

Gender: Female

Location: Florida

Rank: Prosecutor

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:30 pm

Posts: 826

Magmar's Fury wrote:
True, but the reason behind killing and the person who killed are really where people judge how right or wrong the murder is.
Absolutely. You'll get no qualms from me there.

I'm just saying that "X-trait" doesn't automatically deem a person evil because there are exceptions; evil people--TRULY evil people can do good things; the bad may outweigh the good so much that the scale tips over, but there was still something in the good. Ugh, what did Kyle Hyde in H.D. say again, "People do stupid things but they always got a reason." or something like that.

I'm soooo confoozled. :meekins:

Well, anyway, in my personal opinion, the most evil people in the trilogy here were Matt and Dahlia.
Too lazy... hur hur.
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Like, totally.

Gender: Male

Rank: Suspect

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:59 pm

Posts: 45

Dahlila. I can't belive people are saying she's not evil.. I mean, all the things she did, she did for herself and herself only. She didn't care if she hurt people to fulfill her personal goals.

Engarde is bad, too.

Manfred, well... He's not evil because he prosecutes innocent people, that's his job, and he has to do that. However, his motive for killing Edgeworth's dad was bad.

Shellly is pure evil, and the whole "it's his job" one doesn't wash for him, because it's illegal, and prosecuting isn't.
Image
Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title
User avatar

nuuuuu, stoooooop

Gender: Female

Location: America

Rank: Admin

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:16 am

Posts: 5255

I'm just amused that everyone keeps defending Shelly by saying, "It's just his job!" as if he didn't pick out and plan his profession in the first place. If I choose to make kicking puppies my job, and people pay me to do it, yeah, they're pretty horrible for asking me to do it. But I'd say that makes me a pretty sick person to even ask people to give me money to kick puppies.

Shelly may be "nicer" than your average assassin, but in the end he's still killing innocent people for personal gain. That makes him just as bad as anyone else in the series.

Not that I'd call him "evil." I don't think I'd call any of the PW villains truly evil, because in the end they all still have some motive for their actions. I think true evil can only exist in the absense of that--killing someone just for the sake of doing it. I can't think of anyone in the series that qualifies in that sense.
ImageImage
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Utter Nonsense

Gender: Female

Rank: Suspect

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 11:39 am

Posts: 15

Croik wrote:
I don't think I'd call any of the PW villains truly evil, because in the end they all still have some motive for their actions. I think true evil can only exist in the absense of that--killing someone just for the sake of doing it. I can't think of anyone in the series that qualifies in that sense.


It's really a matter of opinion, but I don't think I agree with that definition of "evil". I think most killers have a reason, it's just that some don't have a reason that we're willing to accept. I mean, from what I understand, a lot of serial killers kill because they need to feel powerful, or because they think they are on a mission from God, or because they think that people are sinners or unworthy. And those are all reasons, just not good ones.

I'm trying to think of any example I've ever heard of where a person killed someone for no reason at all, and I can't.

Unfortunately, I also can't currently think of a definition of "evil" that DOES work for me, so I guess my argument is going to fall a little flat. Whoops. :yogi:

But I do agree that just because it's Shelly's job doesn't inherently make him not-evil. He chose to do it, and he seems to even sort of enjoy it.
Image
(colorbar made by neostarfire55 on LJ)
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Iris_Wright wrote:
To me, that is precisely why he is not evil. He kill due to a personal grudge or something, it's his job. It's all a matter of opinion. Anyway, hello fellow Aucklander -_-


Heh, that's exactly why I think that :shelly: is the most evil character. I find the fact that he kills people that haven't wronged him in anyway to absolutely abhorrent. I find it much more honourable to kill some that has done something to you that could go towards justifying the murder.

It was also his choice to become an assassin, meaning he wanted to kill people. So to sum up; he kills for money, has no remorse, and he was not forced to kill anyone... that's textbook evil to me. >.>

And you're from Auckland? That's a rather erm, creepy coincidence. :yuusaku:

Oh, and just for the record I remove my previous statement that von Karma is evil. I consider him to be insane, much like Dahlia and Morgan.
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Objection!

Gender: Male

Location: New Zealand

Rank: Decisive Witness

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:41 am

Posts: 150

Hmm...Shelley might be a killer, but he's an honourable one. He keeps his word, relies on a bond of trust with his client, etc. I find that rather appealing. That is not to say I think killing is okay, but I'm just saying he's not completely(read:completely) evil because of these traits in him that raise him above the likes of Engarde and Gant (ebil schemers with no morals whatsoever). He's still a bad guy, but not a completely evil one, just rather intimidating o_o

And, yeah, Auckland FTW :phoenix:
Iris X Phoenix shipper!

Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title
User avatar

nuuuuu, stoooooop

Gender: Female

Location: America

Rank: Admin

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:16 am

Posts: 5255

n3m3sis42 wrote:
I mean, from what I understand, a lot of serial killers kill because they need to feel powerful, or because they think they are on a mission from God, or because they think that people are sinners or unworthy. And those are all reasons, just not good ones.


But that's just why I don't think you can argue that any "reason" for killing someone is inherently more evil than any other, because everyone has a different point of view and a different justification. The line between justifiable and not justifiable is too thin.

Like, Dee killed in self defense--if she hadn't fought back against Hammer, he might have killed her, and she's not really criminalized for that. But then you have Tigre--if he hadn't killed Glen and gotten MC Bomber from him, he probably would have been killed by the Cadaverinis. They're both examples of self preservation but obviously one is much more understandable than the other. Same motive, different degrees.

And even Matt was acting in self preservation, in a sense: if Juan had revealed his past to the world, Matt's career could have been over. I'm sure no one can say that his response to the threat of Juan was appropriate or excuseable, but it's that same "self preservation" motive again. I can't really call him "evil" because it's understandable that he would want to defend himself, he just chose a really horrible way of doing it.

I guess what it comes down to is I think "horrific" and "evil" are two very different things. Most of the PW villains are awful people, but I still can't think of them as evil.
ImageImage
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three gameTopic%20Title
User avatar

Colour monkey supreme

Gender: None specified

Location: Markham, Ontario

Rank: Medium-in-training

Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:00 pm

Posts: 472

In Shelly's case, I have no idea what kind of people he's killed over the entire course of his career. What struck me as odd about him was how riled up he got when he found out how Matt tried to blackmail him, an outright betrayal of his trust that nearly got him caught by the authorities. Not that he wasn't expecting that to happen anyway, but I think the very idea that he wasn't able to convince his client to trust him completely is a bit of a blow to his professional pride [as ridiculous as it sounds because of his line of work].

I'm torn on my decision on whether Gant is "evil". He was motivated by self-interest the first time around, but was motivated by self-preservation the second time. He was going to get what he wanted anyway, but he got impatient and sped things up. Does his sense of justice in "coming up with evidence" to land crooks in jail make him redeemable somehow? Maybe by just the tiniest bit, but this dude obviously enjoys being in power and exercising it over everyone. Perhaps he really was the kinda hero the judge made him out to be, power corrupts, as they say. Still, what bothers me more was Gant's statement he only cared for himself, something he said quite blatantly in court.
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three gameTopic%20Title

Gender: Male

Location: Poland

Rank: Suspect

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:18 pm

Posts: 30

Speaking of evil characters I'm wondering, if Dahlia actually received love from her father, sister and Morgan Fey, would she still be the devilish persons she was? Or is that painful background that made her become such a monster? Cheath stated that she's just misunderstood, but is there actually any mention of it in the game?
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Utter Nonsense

Gender: Female

Rank: Suspect

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 11:39 am

Posts: 15

Croik wrote:
But that's just why I don't think you can argue that any "reason" for killing someone is inherently more evil than any other, because everyone has a different point of view and a different justification. The line between justifiable and not justifiable is too thin.


I guess what I'm wondering is who *would* be evil by your definition. I just can't think of any example of a character in anything or a person in real life who truly killed for NO reason. I'm not trying to be a bitch (this time), I'm just really curious. Is there anyone you can think of in any context that killed for no reason at all? Because if not, wouldn't that mean that no one is ever truly evil? I mean, even people like Hitler had reasons.

I still can't really think of what I would define as evil. Because I don't think I agree with "someone who kills for no reason" for the reasons I mentioned. And I don't think I agree with "people who kill for an immoral reason" as a definition, for the reasons you stated here (how do you define an "immoral reason?). So that leaves me with "no one is ever evil", which I also don't like, because then what's the point of having such a concept at all?

Hmmmm.
Image
(colorbar made by neostarfire55 on LJ)
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title
User avatar

Mighty Pirate, really!

Gender: None specified

Location: Insert Funny Location Here, Am Busy

Rank: Medium-in-training

Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:30 am

Posts: 336

There's also two accounts we haven't fully taken into consideration here: framing, and first degree.

Framing, to me, seems like almost as bad a crime as the murder. The majority of the murderers in the Phoenix Wright series framed someone to cover their own butts. They were ready to let someone else's life be behind bars for life, or executed over a crime they didn't committ. Also, the case of first degree, that they were planning to murder someone, shows that being able to kill someone wasn't as bad as a fit of rage or self-defense.

Ace Attorney
Frank Sawhit was going to let Larry Butz fry for something the crook did (the fact that Larry wanted to die afterwards... well, that's our Larry). Redd White planned to murder Mia Fey while spying on her, and wanted to have her little sister be sent to jail so he could continue his dishonest life. Dee Vasquez could have swept Jack Hammer's death under the rug too, but she instead choose to let Will Powers, one of the gentle and kind-hearted men in the game, rot in jail for what she had inadvertantly caused. Damon Gant framed Lana and Ema, Ema who was barely a teenager, for murdering two men who trusted him and worked under him.

Justice For All
Richard Wellington tried to have Maggey take the fall for his stupid mix-up that led to murder. Mimi Miney was trying to cover herself, because of her previous incompotence and wrecklessness that ended with many people, including her sister, dying; she planned out to murder Dr. Grey, and was going to frame Maya, who had never done anything to her, it just gave Mimi a scapegoat. Matt... well, we all know he is evil, even if he didn't do any killing; but we consider Hitler evil, and his forces were doing the mass murder and genocide, much like Matt had Shelley do his dirty work for him.

Trials and Tribulations
Dahlia four times framed someone so they'd rot in jail for all their life instead of her, and murdered two people, one first and one second. Tigre killed someone for money (even though, to be kind, he needed it desperately for reasons that weren't his fault), and went great lengths to ensure Maggey would pay for his sins.

***

In my humble POV, I think the act of framing someone for the worst crime is basically an extension, one almost as bad. Some of the murders don't quite fall into this, like Acro, who never meant to frame Max and considered turning himself in; Yanni's life was ruined by John Hammond, and he was led to believe Edgeworth was responsible for the crime he was framed for; Luke and his 'partner' were being blackmailed, and after killed the man, Luke tried to get Ron sentenced for a much light crime by testifying he was robbing some other place, rather than the scene of the murder. And from my point of view, Godot saw the woman who 'killed' him, and since very very few of us could understand how that is, I can hardly fault him for losing his mind.

Well... whacha think? :edgy:
Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Objection!

Gender: Male

Location: New Zealand

Rank: Decisive Witness

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:41 am

Posts: 150

Hmm yeah I think framing an innocent person is bad, but it's not evil. It's merely self-preservation, to cover up your crime.I have found my definition of true evil, by the way. It is manipulating others around you to carry out your wishes without having anyone you trust. Engarde used Shelley while videoing him in action, and framed Adrian for his murder. Gant ruined Ema and Lana's lives, not to mention ended Neil Marshall's merely for his own benefit. These two are the only truly evil characters, because they really trust no one at all, and do things purely for their own good.

That's my opinion at least :phoenix: Not having anyone you trust is truly sad.
Iris X Phoenix shipper!

Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title
User avatar

nuuuuu, stoooooop

Gender: Female

Location: America

Rank: Admin

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:16 am

Posts: 5255

n3m3sis42 wrote:
I guess what I'm wondering is who *would* be evil by your definition. I just can't think of any example of a character in anything or a person in real life who truly killed for NO reason. I'm not trying to be a bitch (this time), I'm just really curious. Is there anyone you can think of in any context that killed for no reason at all? Because if not, wouldn't that mean that no one is ever truly evil? I mean, even people like Hitler had reasons.


That's kind of what I was getting at, actually. I don't really believe most humans are capable of "evil" in the way the word is meant. I feel like it implies that there's no possible excuse for the action in question. If at least one person gains from it, how can it be completely evil? That's how I see it, anyway.
ImageImage
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Croik wrote:
n3m3sis42 wrote:
I guess what I'm wondering is who *would* be evil by your definition. I just can't think of any example of a character in anything or a person in real life who truly killed for NO reason. I'm not trying to be a bitch (this time), I'm just really curious. Is there anyone you can think of in any context that killed for no reason at all? Because if not, wouldn't that mean that no one is ever truly evil? I mean, even people like Hitler had reasons.


That's kind of what I was getting at, actually. I don't really believe most humans are capable of "evil" in the way the word is meant. I feel like it implies that there's no possible excuse for the action in question. If at least one person gains from it, how can it be completely evil? That's how I see it, anyway.


I too believe that no human is capable of being truly evil. Although my definition is a wee bit different.
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Objection!

Gender: Male

Location: New Zealand

Rank: Decisive Witness

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:41 am

Posts: 150

When did this become a philosophical debate about evil? :phoenix: Anyway, I think it is possible for someone to be truly evil, when said person commits crimes for no one except himself/herself. That is true selfishness, and makes a person evil as he is doing things purely for his own benefit and no one else's.
Iris X Phoenix shipper!

Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Iris_Wright wrote:
When did this become a philosophical debate about evil? :phoenix: Anyway, I think it is possible for someone to be truly evil, when said person commits crimes for no one except himself/herself. That is true selfishness, and makes a person evil as he is doing things purely for his own benefit and no one else's.


I once stole an apple from my neighbour's apple tree, and I was only doing it for myself. ._.

Am I evil? ;_:
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Objection!

Gender: Male

Location: New Zealand

Rank: Decisive Witness

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:41 am

Posts: 150

Quote:
I once stole an apple from my neighbour's apple tree, and I was only doing it for myself. ._.

Am I evil? ;_:


-_- I'm not even going to dignify that with a response. If you really want one, YES YOU ARE EVIL :edgeworth:

Really, I think you know what I mean by crimes. Murder, framing others etc... those are crimes. Stealing an apple is well...kinda small -_-
Iris X Phoenix shipper!

Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title
User avatar

nuuuuu, stoooooop

Gender: Female

Location: America

Rank: Admin

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:16 am

Posts: 5255

Iris_Wright wrote:
When did this become a philosophical debate about evil? :phoenix: Anyway, I think it is possible for someone to be truly evil, when said person commits crimes for no one except himself/herself. That is true selfishness, and makes a person evil as he is doing things purely for his own benefit and no one else's.


But if you kill someone in self defense, aren't you also doing that only for yourself? You're putting your right to live above that of someone else's.

I didn't mean to make this a debate, I just wanted to say why I don't think any of the PW characters are "evil". :gregory:
ImageImage
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Utter Nonsense

Gender: Female

Rank: Suspect

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 11:39 am

Posts: 15

Croik wrote:
That's kind of what I was getting at, actually. I don't really believe most humans are capable of "evil" in the way the word is meant. I feel like it implies that there's no possible excuse for the action in question. If at least one person gains from it, how can it be completely evil? That's how I see it, anyway.


Ah, well that's fair, then. Even if I don't know that I entirely agree with you, it's obviously a perfectly valid opinion. Thanks for taking the time to explain. :edgy:
Image
(colorbar made by neostarfire55 on LJ)
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Utter Nonsense

Gender: Female

Rank: Suspect

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 11:39 am

Posts: 15

Oh, and since I totally 'jacked this thread, I guess I should veer back onto the original topic and state which PW characters I see as evil. I guess I'd say probably Matt Engarde, Shelly DeKiller, Redd White, Morgan Fey and Dahlia Hawthorne, because while I still haven't come up with a really good definition for my personal concept of "evil", I'm pretty sure that it has something to do with being completely unable to care for any other human being in even the smallest way.
Image
(colorbar made by neostarfire55 on LJ)
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Objection!

Gender: Male

Location: New Zealand

Rank: Decisive Witness

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:41 am

Posts: 150

That's what I was getting at. Trusting no one else, caring for no one, and commiting crimes just for your own selfish benefit is evil.
Iris X Phoenix shipper!

Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three gameTopic%20Title

That's er, exactly what Shelly does. >_____>
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Objection!

Gender: Male

Location: New Zealand

Rank: Decisive Witness

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:41 am

Posts: 150

He trusts his clients =D and honours his word etc. I like honorable people, so maybe I'm biased towards Shelley =/ Engarde has no scruples at all, so I hate his guts.
Iris X Phoenix shipper!

Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Objection!

Gender: None specified

Rank: Suspect

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:58 pm

Posts: 19

please explain to me word for word
why is engarde more evil than all the others?

and why are people doubting dahlias evilness?

evil:
:karma: > :redd: > :chinami: > :morgan: > :badger:

depending on motive,how many ppl were killed and so on

explanation:
karma killed many ppl with forged evidence and destroyed lives in court for a perfect record
redd blackmailed many ppl and brought them to suicide for money
Dahlia killed many ppl, wanted to kill the love of her twin sister, left her twin sister at a mountain, Godot... everything was selfish
morgan she wanted to kill ppl just to be the main family
badger oh come on hes just gotta be evil..or on drugs


again
shelly de killer was a mere tool like a weapon and allthough he did kill for money he didnt even know the victims...if it wouldnt be for shelly ppl may have died in a more painfull way
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three gameTopic%20Title

Quote:
shelly de killer was a mere tool like a weapon and allthough he did kill for money he didnt even know the victims...if it wouldnt be for shelly ppl may have died in a more painfull way


-__-

You could use a similar in an attempt to justify the actions of various genocidal dictators.

And I doubt think I'm going to see anyone trying to say that Hitler and Pol Pot aren't evil as a human can possibly get.

Karma isn't evil in my eyes, because he was absolutely insane. He got so absorbed in his win record that nothing mattered, he was nothing but a shell of himself.

Same thing with Morgan, if her husband hadn't have left her, nothing would have happened. Dahlia would have most likely grown up as a normal person, as well.

So, Morgan's husband is the most evil character. >_>
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Objection!

Gender: Male

Location: New Zealand

Rank: Decisive Witness

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:41 am

Posts: 150

Seconded >.> Even though we've never seen him, he is definitely evil.
Iris X Phoenix shipper!

Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title
User avatar

Gender: Male

Rank: Prosecutor

Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:35 am

Posts: 965

DeKillers an honorable assassin for a reason once he found out the truth the hostage was let go. MATTS EVIL FOR BLACKMAILING AN ASSASSIN! and Morgan....what drives her is evil yet not evil because it seems she wants her own daughter to become master...but shes still evil XD
Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three gameTopic%20Title

Well, to be fair. Morgan doesn't care about Pearly at all, she's only using her as a tool so that she can bring glory to herself. She never once considered Pearl's feelings.
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Objection!

Gender: Male

Location: New Zealand

Rank: Decisive Witness

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:41 am

Posts: 150

Yeah. She set Pearly up for a murder, pretty much. If everything had gone as planned, then Pearl would have murdered Maya. That would have pretty much shattered her psyche, you think?
Iris X Phoenix shipper!

Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three gameTopic%20Title

I don't know actually, I think Pearls is a bloodthirsty little girl. Reincarnation of Elizabeth Bathory. :P
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Objection!

Gender: Male

Location: New Zealand

Rank: Decisive Witness

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:41 am

Posts: 150

o_0 Pearly is awesome! I love the way she keeps abusing Phoenix, I actually LOLed at the mental image of Pearl uppercutting him when he and Iris were googly eyed with each other.
Iris X Phoenix shipper!

Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Gender: Male

Rank: Suspect

Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:20 am

Posts: 9

It's obvious who the most evil character in the Phoenix Wright franchise is...

It's Ron DeLite! :accordion-head: He claimed to steal a sacred urn! EEEEEVIIIIIL! >_>

... Ok, more seriously now. XD;;

Spoiler: Major spoilers for all of T&T
I'd have to say Dahlia Hawthorne is the most evil person in the series, she went crime after crime ruining lives and causing deaths without remorse, going as far to plot revenge from beyond the grave.

She influenced her father into leaving her twin sister behind at Hazakura Temple, convinced Terry Fawles to help her steal a $2 million diamond, and then framed him for her death. When her step sister agreed to let Terry know the truth, she killed her and framed Terry AGAIN, eventually leading him to commiting suicide in court in order to protect her. She poisoned Diego Armando because he was getting close to the truth and managed to trick Phoenix into hiding the evidence, planning to kill him later to get it back. Of course, when that failed, she framed him for the murder of her ex-boyfriend. Like... That's pretty evil.

And of course, the whole attempted murder of Maya Fey and the "Well, I'm already dead, what're you going to do to me?" attitude was just REALLY nasty.


And I'd probably rank Matt Enguarde in as second.
ONOES! I don't have a sig! D:

Oh hey, after writing that, I got one somehow! :O
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three gameTopic%20Title

OBJECTION!

Gender: Male

Location: St. Albans, England, UK

Rank: Ace Attorney

Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:18 am

Posts: 2603

Characters who I think are pure evil are
Spoiler:
Matt, Von Karma and Gant. Gant is possibly even worse because he's a police chief, and he used Lana and framed Ema. :( Certainly evil.
Von Karma is also a lefitimately evil person.
Also Morgan was bad!
How was Pearls set up as the murderer? (Though at one point I did actually think Pearls did it). Morgan tried to frame Maya.


And as a poster said, Morgan didnt really *care* about Pearls.
Nick and Maya - Friends and Lovers....
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Objection!

Gender: Male

Location: New Zealand

Rank: Decisive Witness

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:41 am

Posts: 150

No, the most evil character ever was obviously the Blue Badger. That video in case 1-5 where we had to point out contradictions was the worst experience of my life.
Iris X Phoenix shipper!

Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

grim_tales wrote:
Characters who I think are pure evil are
Spoiler:
Matt, Von Karma and Gant. Gant is possibly even worse because he's a police chief, and he used Lana and framed Ema. :( Certainly evil.
Von Karma is also a lefitimately evil person.
Also Morgan was bad!
How was Pearls set up as the murderer? (Though at one point I did actually think Pearls did it). Morgan tried to frame Maya.


And as a poster said, Morgan didnt really *care* about Pearls.


von Karma became obsessed with his perfect win record to the point where nothing else mattered... he isn't evil, just a little insane.

Same thing with Morgan, her husband leaving her absolutely crushed her. The only thing she could think about was becoming the main family, as her failure to do so was what ruined her life. Morgan was never herself after that incident.

By the way, why are we using spoiler tags? It's clearly outlined in the topic title that there are going to be large spoilers throughout. :S
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Pigeon seeds!

Gender: Male

Rank: Suspect

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:31 pm

Posts: 19

Croik wrote:
I'm just amused that everyone keeps defending Shelly by saying, "It's just his job!" as if he didn't pick out and plan his profession in the first place. If I choose to make kicking puppies my job, and people pay me to do it, yeah, they're pretty horrible for asking me to do it. But I'd say that makes me a pretty sick person to even ask people to give me money to kick puppies.

Shelly may be "nicer" than your average assassin, but in the end he's still killing innocent people for personal gain. That makes him just as bad as anyone else in the series.

That's just how his character was set up... Someone who thinks he is just doing his job, no remorse, but a honourable person who will do everything to protect his "client" with whom he has a contract. The entire funny thing about case 2.4 is that Shelly isn't actually evil, he just thinks he is a professional who highly values the quality of his services and not a wicked murderer.

Croik wrote:
Not that I'd call him "evil." I don't think I'd call any of the PW villains truly evil, because in the end they all still have some motive for their actions. I think true evil can only exist in the absense of that--killing someone just for the sake of doing it. I can't think of anyone in the series that qualifies in that sense.

What about Engarde? He did it for his public image, for his own ego... But that's less of an understandable motive than Von Karma's (his obsessive perfectionism and insanity), Morgan's (how useless she felt after being weaker than Misty and becoming a branch family), etc. I'd say Engarde was truly evil.
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three gameTopic%20Title

None

Gender: None specified

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 4:09 am

Posts: 82

It seems that Redd White did the most horrible crimes out of all the killers.
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

"Glimmerous Fop"

Gender: None specified

Location: South London

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 6:09 pm

Posts: 71

Matt was the most evil for me, because he didn't have any reason, per se, to become EVILLLLL.

Morgan was dishonored, Dahlia was unloved, etc.
Image
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Louis wrote:
Matt was the most evil for me, because he didn't have any reason, per se, to become EVILLLLL.

Morgan was dishonored, Dahlia was unloved, etc.


He has some rather nasty scars on his face... really, being so severely disfigured is enough to make any reasonable man into a homicidal sociopath.
Re: Completely Evil characters. (Spoilers for all three games)Topic%20Title

Gender: Male

Location: Wherever you least expect me to be

Rank: Prosecutor

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:45 am

Posts: 745

GearsoftheApparatus wrote:
Louis wrote:
Matt was the most evil for me, because he didn't have any reason, per se, to become EVILLLLL.

Morgan was dishonored, Dahlia was unloved, etc.


He has some rather nasty scars on his face... really, being so severely disfigured is enough to make any reasonable man into a homicidal sociopath.
That, and he was under the influence of Shoe...who happens to be a drug king and header of half of the world's crime synidcates.
Page 2 of 4 [ 141 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

 Board index » Phoenix Wright » Defendant's Lobby » Hazakurain (GS3)

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  
News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list
Powered by phpBB

phpBB SEO