*insert kirk vs. picard argument here*

The fanbase is divided over this. Personally, I'm not terribly concerned as to what other sites think.

---

*shrugs* Maybe.

But I always thought that Kirk VS Picard was a silly arguement anyway. It's obviously Sisko :D

---

Urgh...Star trek now? >_>

Anyway, In a fanbase , any fanbase really, there will always be divided oppinions, This is not limited to the Ace attorney fandom/series.
Now, Instead of Pointing out the gaps we have, why not point out the things that we agree upon, the things that makes us a fandom.
The love for the series...

Also, beam me up Scotty. XD

Which other sites?

This witness is speaking nonsense! Everyone knows that nobody ever changes their clothes except in important, plot-related events! This testimony cannot be trusted!

Did anybody else think that in 4-4, and should have combined the Magatama and Bracelet to epically shatter 's Black Psyche-Locks? It would have been pretty awesome.

Also, should be getting back his Badge after GS4, dual-timeline or not. Why? He lost it for the forgery of the diary page, correct? In 4-4, however, it was proven that had framed him in the forgery. Now, if someone frames you for murder, do you get penalized? Once it's proven that you're innocent, no. So, being framed for forgery should also have no penalty, once it's proven that you're innocent. So, the dual-timeline has nothing to do with wanting back and to go away, because it's unnecessary.

I think the TV Tropes Wiki does. See the Discontinuity: Video Game article.

oh boy I do love my epic crack theories. Someone should make a fangame where this whole thing is actually real.

but... wait... why does retconning the time of Edgeworth's departure make the entire case non-canon? All you have to do is ignore maybe two or three lines in JFA. Which is certainly less complicated than coming up with an insane theory out of whole cloth.

---